From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fsTUR-0001mw-TW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:48:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fsTUQ-0002RL-Uo for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:48:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fsTUQ-0002Qr-GX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:48:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fsTUQ-0002Bq-D6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:48:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#32428] [PATCH] gnu: mit-scheme: Use minimal texlive-union. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180813160643.15076-1-ambrevar@gmail.com> <87zhxgahb9.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm9vak6w.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:46:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bm9vak6w.fsf@gmail.com> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:05:59 +0200") Message-ID: <871saqikdu.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 32428@debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus Hello, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > My limited understanding of this is that some TeXlive packages don't buil= d the > fonts they need at install time, only at runtime. I don't quite understa= nd why > that is. > > It's not clear to me if it's possible to build these fonts in advance. Ricardo, do you have an idea about why =E2=80=98texlive-union=E2=80=99 fail= s to build fonts in advance? Did we encounter this issue before? > That said, in the present state it's only required to generate the docume= ntation > when building the package. While this escapes the build directory, I ass= ume > this > > Hopefully we will come with a clearer answer to this issue in the future. > > I'll merge considering the workaround is much better than having a full t= exlive > as a dependency. Definitely. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.