From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j54CB-0004R2-SY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:02:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j54CA-0006ze-UC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:02:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j54CA-0006zI-Pz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:02:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j54CA-00048D-OD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:02:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39588] gnu: Add mpich, scalapack-mpich, mumps-mpich, pt-scotch-mpich, python-mpi4py-mpich Resent-Message-ID: From: Maurice =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A9mond?= References: <87blq2rclk.fsf@inria.fr> <87o8tx3z2q.fsf@gnu.org> <87k14j6amk.fsf@inria.fr> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:01:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:34:56 +0100") Message-ID: <871rqojouv.fsf@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Maurice =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A9mond?= Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: zimoun Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 39588@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Simon, >The digression about implicit inputs was not relevant, sorry. :-) no worry, it made me learn some guix internals that were obscure to me! >(arguments > `(#:configure-flags `("-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=YES") > #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases > (add-before 'check 'mpi-setup > ,%openmpi-setup)))) Even if it only sets variables and should be harmless here, I don't know, would it be easy to make this openmpi-setup become a mpi-setup with ad-hoc initialisations? Maurice