From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56686)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jJkWp-0005oU-F5
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 17:04:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jJkWo-0005N5-JJ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 17:04:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55431)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jJkWo-0005Mv-EG
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 17:04:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jJkWo-0002S0-Ad
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 17:04:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#40350] [PATCH] ui: Mention that changes to package definitions
 can cause "upgrades".
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40350.B40350.15857750119311@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <c2ca777e9b3e9dbdc80d85ef02b3d27407f1122a.1585667732.git.leo@famulari.name>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 23:03:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <c2ca777e9b3e9dbdc80d85ef02b3d27407f1122a.1585667732.git.leo@famulari.name>
 (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:15:32 -0400")
Message-ID: <871rp6udet.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: 40350@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> * guix/ui.scm (show-manifest-transaction)[upgrade-string]: Use the
> package name in UI message.

[...]

>                            (if (string=3D? old new)
> -                              (G_ "(dependencies changed)")
> +                              (format
> +                                (G_ "(dependencies or ~a package recipe =
changed)")

Is that not implied in a way?

If it is, how about something shorter like:

  (dependencies or package changed)

?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.