From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRX3c-0000MJ-Ek for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 04:18:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRX3b-0005xJ-SD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 04:18:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRX3b-0005wy-GV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 04:18:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jRX3a-00005K-6W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 04:18:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40756] gnu: Add ktsuss. Resent-Message-ID: From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <20200421192622.7d6412e0.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:17:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200421192622.7d6412e0.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> (Raghav Gururajan's message of "Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:26:22 -0400") Message-ID: <871roeliph.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Raghav Gururajan Cc: 40756@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Raghav Gururajan writes: > Subject: [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add ktsuss. Thank you! It looks mostly good. I have some comments, tho. > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + (add-after 'unpack 'patch Could you provide a more insightful name for the new phase? :) > + (lambda _ > + (substitute* "configure.ac" > + (("sudopath=`which sudo 2>/dev/null`") > + (string-append "sudopath=" > + (string-append (assoc-ref %build-inputs "sudo") > + "/bin/sudo")))) Please use (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys) ...) and `inputs' instead of the magical %build-inputs. > + (synopsis "Graphical front-end for Su") I would write: Graphical front end for @command{su} > + (description "Ktsuss stands for 'keep the su simple, stupid', and as the > +name says, is a graphical version (frontend) of su written in C and GTK+ 2. The > +idea of the project is to remain simple and bug free.") What about : (description "Ktsuss stands for ``Keep the @command{su} simple, stupid''. It is a graphical version of @command{su} written in C and GTK+ 2, with simplicity in mind.") > + (license > + (list > + (license:non-copyleft "file://COPYING") > + (license:non-copyleft "file://LICENSE"))))) It looks like the license is `bsd-3'. Do you have any reason to think otherwise ? Could you send an updated patch? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou