From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4H9BJ9tN+172PgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:36:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id MI0kI9tN+15qTAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:36:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF128940656 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41158 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqHMm-00087u-C6 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:36:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqHMf-00087I-VC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:36:01 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39832) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jqHMf-0008Me-Mp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:36:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jqHMf-0003DS-It for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42048] [PATCH 3/6] channels: Remove 'signature' from . Resent-From: Ricardo Wurmus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42048 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 42048@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42048-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42048.159352772912321 (code B ref 42048); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 42048) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2020 14:35:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51378 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jqHM9-0003Ce-8u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:35:29 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21141) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jqHM7-0003CW-3w for 42048@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:35:27 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593527721; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=f9tHU7QVuH8j++bm353K+BRfGkgPWiLq9SeFGs8PvA+B7I10FT2N03F+jAh+z7PV9jCsKkjBSo37b9lrVgbhoVEAZM/rdeF6xdACewR2rukfnaTTPj/CtpGjdvUHnKX/TcUp+kcZoep2qNOUePC7U3E8H10bkYXZZ1VBRzbKwJY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1593527721; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=eluen0/Xwz1QvcJ6rzl0K4tk4CSFOtH6RKduptvVQ4E=; b=oLtlS6QdpKJENzGQVbMNJre3AE4OxvjLEVIeDnqoUW9aK/hiq+FiamqvPn4Qc61Q9GtKifTyQdgys3PQiRLE8IG+lh2ZEHKmVEohldZPSRGTGoYH92F6SuJ4M56HyCwSAT3O5gKh+BTdX3h1zVZamtn7J4jcChuEAjeIvVpBQFI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1593527721; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=eluen0/Xwz1QvcJ6rzl0K4tk4CSFOtH6RKduptvVQ4E=; b=f5xK9VFnjatCCAW7HfXlPyPDSu3ZIRbADmZShofSO+mr9i8NfEKt8XXl/gmdF/bp g782YvIXUNQVZ11KhfFyyBRve1hnZzQE0/iNwkLQ6Gt1CmKfjFCOD/Wyh2NX+TRlN3P faOkS8vMGNg0x7hrK7MG1dy9/EJh13BSakiwlLq4= Received: from localhost (p54ad4df8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.77.248]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1593527717790391.9461373074156; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:35:17 -0700 (PDT) References: <20200625211605.29316-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20200625211605.29316-3-ludo@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <20200625211605.29316-3-ludo@gnu.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:35:14 +0200 Message-ID: <871rlwoc4d.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=f5xK9VFn; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.99 X-TUID: RVAvptCjeaDt Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > In the end signing the commit/key pair does not buy us much. Someone > publishing a valid but different commit/key pair would effectively be > publishing a different channel, which could be a fork (made by a former > authorized developer) or simply a mirror. In the latter case, there's > nothing to be gained by publishing a different commit/key pair. > > * guix/channels.scm ()[signature]: Remove. > (make-channel-introduction): Adjust accordingly. > --- [=E2=80=A6] > (define (make-channel-introduction commit signer) > "Return a new channel introduction: COMMIT is the introductory where > authentication starts, and SIGNER is the OpenPGP fingerprint (a bytevect= or) of > the signer of that commit." > - (%make-channel-introduction commit signer #f)) > + (%make-channel-introduction commit signer)) Do we still need this procedure at all? Looks like %make-channel-introduction could simply be renamed to make-channel-introduc= tion. --=20 Ricardo