From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id MK+iFDzOoV/9MgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 21:40:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id SO+FEDzOoV8qfgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 21:40:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C86949404C8 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ka42D-0002sy-Io for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:40:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ka426-0002sa-Dj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:40:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ka426-0008Ns-3X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:40:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ka425-0000M5-Tk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:40:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44249] [PATCH v2] gnu: emacs: Make strip-double-wrap more robust Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 21:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44249 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Morgan Smith Cc: 44249@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44249-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44249.16044395491296 (code B ref 44249); Tue, 03 Nov 2020 21:40:01 +0000 Received: (at 44249) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Nov 2020 21:39:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ka41E-0000Kq-TV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:39:09 -0500 Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.201]:48671) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ka41C-0000KL-NA for 44249@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 16:39:07 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88F531BF205; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:38:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <87blgn4bk6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874km6n58l.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r1pali7v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 22:38:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Morgan Smith's message of "Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:49:30 -0500") Message-ID: <871rha5de5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: jEJB+rC9alwO Morgan Smith writes: > So I need to use the module (ice-9 match) there to get the definition of > match. However, it seems to override the modules that where previously > available there so I have to add them back. Ah. True. > Can you confirm how you create the error? I cannot. I tested your patch before applying it, and could compile Emacs just fine. However, as Ludovic reported it on IRC this commit had introduced issues in `emacs-minimal' package, hence the revert. See, if I understand Guix Data correctly, http://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/b107a19ffb6a6abb7bde3436f3fa359071bd1f5c/package/emacs-minimal/27.1 Regards,