From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id eMllK0HHv1+YYgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:18:25 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id ENBcJ0HHv19STwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:18:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30FD59405D2 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56734 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiJ2N-0003p7-ME for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:18:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiJ26-0003nv-N0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:18:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiJ22-000835-F8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:18:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiJ22-0001iF-B6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44810] [PATCH v3] gnu: Add git-open. Resent-From: EuAndreh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44810 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: leo@famulari.name, 44810@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Leo Famulari , EuAndreh via Guix-patches via X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: , 44810@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44810-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44810.16064038716555 (code B ref 44810); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 44810) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2020 15:17:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42470 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiJ1q-0001he-KC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:17:50 -0500 Received: from box.euandre.org ([46.101.160.115]:52389) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kiJ1k-0001hB-RQ for 44810@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:17:45 -0500 Received: from authenticated-user (box.euandre.org [46.101.160.115]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by box.euandre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3978FC3ED; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:17:37 -0300 (-03) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=euandre.org; s=mail; t=1606403859; bh=iQar1wbEmF657LOjIDeWcAKp4qFWwaNRZ18eDv/zbc8=; h=From:To:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=P4W8QQ7oS87RjdkkZobhqOvcVHtzUySr9HCGuJC6J9JB1WfQNji7kBXnrXQdx2lCR VbfEENWIO5JqSBDvKG1o8cOYeD78v+7yqpcpdUDN4EOCcrUC829PjsiY1xZ8SwbUIS qZNsMaQ4I10fHbjGjBdT/Tvw4AWo3ihCCzvp/qhGFZ3TYPD5XHaJ1An1IEPxCuYBnF ZZVGuI9ugD60wLwazlVc045KTt273cqU7mFb+lb2fTwM0TytpkYDhWGZStG+MRz0QI p3vGho1+oFJJFiIlk6R0ZQxmdYVT2s3Yh5kqVb/qffg31Xc5jzBu6I08X5AXe8PMe5 Yc99sDk6pu13Q== In-Reply-To: <20201125230610.GB2093@jasmine.lan> References: <20201123011708.3436-1-eu@euandre.org> <20201123194439.23444-1-eu@euandre.org> <20201125230610.GB2093@jasmine.lan> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:17:32 -0300 Message-ID: <871rggno4z.fsf@euandre.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: EuAndreh , EuAndreh via Guix-patches From: EuAndreh via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: inc X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=euandre.org header.s=mail header.b=P4W8QQ7o; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: Fr4aThreMDa2 Leo Famulari writes: > It might cause trouble for users to propagate xdg-utils, but we'll cross > that bridge when we come to it. Guix isn't really that convenient for > shell scripts. Why is that? If more than one package propagates xdg-utils, won't they all share the same xdg-utils? It would be a problem when to different builds of xdg-utils are propagated, and they become conflicting. Is that what you're referring to? > Anyways, really pushed as d6d5a67e759075cddd0c0075740ea5628fc8c0d1 Thanks!