From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id aHS8AiiF8mQ6bAAA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 02:43:20 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id aHS8AiiF8mQ6bAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 Sep 2023 02:43:20 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9957C316FE for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 02:43:19 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=envs.net header.s=modoboa header.b="ZZZv/wGz"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1693615400; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=T510dyA2ETNxKigpDG1A0gEgNgfvwTeWhVV9Nw/bpBo=; b=biQymB7ORfGBSYRei2hqAc6Zlzb2mPMAk4lpAMrjL1NuJrt8YP+iu/Y0odBW64pZAo+1wG qcvhxBih3jxPnqGc90Ib/tzxehomcbuazzsfxka5cDpx3vx42oZE7PcQOP6OcUhO1oidsx 4LWzcGwA49mfrB0WEU7RiYXQjptWMt794JpAsve1UvHXS27PCSeFzBM1dRWz5QVXnmvU8V bq7ka7mm1ca8HxoZfZi0Aj7A7I9GuhAWPQIPAdtOfjhXPwsDHdKshAUfbZ6qqUQofT4NXo pNxL74LXOHqjZPwVpEVL/NxsH7hV/56yQBqEhcd+Xq6T7BgD2GIcxWcBQgb0wQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1693615400; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Po9SnHEqCuWLutzUIeNjYkWlbU0/L0HIQd1pBIMSk/rwL8rhdEt0gnP6QSD7hdIth3AgHC nZMelLbQrfnBQuigNZfDxzgVidginLcKq/6A6mEiBoUpMsoC8yOdzhKNktNyoyzYFFbXxY IaAj0VoGSlomR+mab7hX5SfnafbNICBgR4g3ZsaJ9LQMs2jhaZW3XH4xHOxBNZ5AXux3yB gP24DM9qlQnhD1xWHEy551GEpWo85nOMie7JKINpNM76Q8rPLxbXdGE2uMaL8Z1aODZPdQ rojTz+0KznuAKeoEDKDaX3CFk7Va3naojzoMyC1mxztXo/+kYgIVFHfcRFpkGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=envs.net header.s=modoboa header.b="ZZZv/wGz"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcEjD-0002CF-IV; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 20:43:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcEiz-0002Ac-UI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 20:42:54 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcEiz-00056U-M2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 20:42:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcEj9-0005Nr-3H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 20:43:03 -0400 Subject: bug#65550: Don't add propagated-inputs for all outputs Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2023 00:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 65550 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 65550-done@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= , Liliana Marie Prikler Mail-Followup-To: 65550@debbugs.gnu.org, iyzsong@envs.net, iyzsong@envs.net Received: via spool by 65550-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D65550.169361537220664 (code D ref 65550); Sat, 02 Sep 2023 00:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 65550-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2023 00:42:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34552 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcEix-0005NE-Q3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 20:42:52 -0400 Received: from mail.envs.net ([5.199.136.28]:34524) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qcEiw-0005N6-5V for 65550-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 20:42:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (mail.envs.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.envs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1998938A0142; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 00:42:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=envs.net; s=modoboa; t=1693615360; bh=T510dyA2ETNxKigpDG1A0gEgNgfvwTeWhVV9Nw/bpBo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZZZv/wGzKeBLIwmqz5T8OnuS4dfkerDroxszeJCICHunmm+FjyJtTk3D+No8810HW B7kwJSlf2mcdnTBjbM9SBekqIN8XO9A0s5Zlco8F7vubbZYr7huokp3ShvbyADTf03 EicIGWHjLyQJomFIPcpM0S5Bdb5jzCf26XYhjhldbxZD5Sj/x9/eqG5P9gE/jFhHj3 B3GYQZ091pcjA77wsAP8E/wUpXF8R3aBbrWN1BcOzYG7Lx7dRM7TDrQ3sSptsS4P/8 tQ9x5ODK/s5WNiHHfQfXP3sjtJDF1pkDFFsmqjA+sVrKNBBIz2bdk7Nuele+73HLR3 05zVSZFVhIWGNt93d1wKJfcRFJx/4wzXo/QvdSAheg2BuyrE9qvwjh7y+0ngkX+pWp HVJ62w4WqffkNWatka8TiZKD0E9B+hRMbOCx8QTb8tU0SiVviPuVe97A+il0wQl5MR 4nUAu17r4RTYDaY2djVF9T5jyrVEw6mFY9qbm36an9BSWiQBWGuDIOAmsRiR1ZYgO9 6K19HG/DLzF8XNRz8DwG9KcmBdHf+jY8s/Q7tTGUr+GeQMRFg8Y5LVTBdac2gckDjE cVqPnLQXv89d8DT+5rJrpyMS/qS4bfXou/qAILpiH8SaSlJMPgJL8IUrpexznwEwZZ HyuBDfS01kAe3CMvaFKdfJaY= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.envs.net Received: from mail.envs.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.envs.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id x2wLAwypFopu; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 00:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [36.170.58.199]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.envs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 00:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id b90494f2; Sat, 2 Sep 2023 00:43:01 +0000 (UTC) References: <1f7f85189b17ebddb6d0e26afd7c5fad88c997e9.1693057951.git.iyzsong@member.fsf.org> <851f008ab9e989badb8bcb10f4b7eee5bc5616c0.camel@gmail.com> <87a5u67hb7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87a5u6yrz0.fsf@envs.net> <87ttse0wby.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2023 08:43:01 +0800 In-Reply-To: <87ttse0wby.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Fri, 01 Sep 2023 11:03:45 -0400") Message-ID: <871qfhiewa.fsf@envs.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= X-ACL-Warn: , =?utf-8?b?5a6L5paH5q2mIHZpYSBHdWl4LXBhdGNoZXM=?= From: =?utf-8?b?5a6L5paH5q2mIHZpYSBHdWl4LXBhdGNoZXM=?= via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9957C316FE X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.71 X-Spam-Score: -3.71 X-TUID: GVhX6YWMrdkw Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hi, > > =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 writes: > > [...] > >>> I think we'd need to evaluate what we'd gain in terms of size reduction >>> a bit more carefully before moving in this direction and how it'd impact >>> the user experience. E.g., if we can reduce the minimal Guix image size >>> by maybe 30%, that'd be nice, but if we're talking of about 5% like in >>> your example profile, it doesn't seem worth the complexity to me. >> >> I agree, thanks Maxim and Liliana for the inputs! > > Should we close this issue for now? Yes, closing.