From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id W+EiKi6F917bOgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:43:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id EH1hJS6F916mIQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:43:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 411459404C7 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50236 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpEr6-0005F5-Uy for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:43:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpEr1-0005Er-2t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:43:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpEr0-00035x-Ic for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpEr0-0000Ul-Ge for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42019] [PATCH 1/1] website: Add integrity to JSON sources. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42019 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 42019@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42019-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42019.15932797291821 (code B ref 42019); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 42019) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2020 17:42:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44558 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpEq9-0000TJ-A2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:42:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com ([209.85.128.66]:33149) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpEq7-0000Sr-6A for 42019@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 13:42:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id a6so10942494wmm.0 for <42019@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:42:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qPuDV0oiO2Lff4JNFtmchB9WvHsSrIowzCY8rbKPYIg=; b=dZr5rSUeR1uYhlIyRwmxVgDWmzcWvxv/OIyqCHRLYrRSZPHqqthZBF991a7DyLV91N E7LCwYEomu+ptEaw5ApRTr2YnJH/Gz2Z0mIIdsq49yKppO1LeSTpYLzDR2qrvj8X9HE5 EAAdXAMaOor7+f87rCwyDqSfeDZho9kfqinYwplK+2sD2WPpCxAYXXA0R/0OxAtdFznd eq76TiwASfGOdYQ661GYCaLvYztXT9c5X1daGR4suVyQiBnkBUa4OkuhZFXphwhmJoEO KGiIoKQNOLSHdZEqv5Uoii3wKzHo+r2IaqiBTXZYB9ckY6kyx8e0g4uAx6qHoAkvyd4D XOHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qPuDV0oiO2Lff4JNFtmchB9WvHsSrIowzCY8rbKPYIg=; b=q2Rw4yLPNHkw2LPQuVm7XXPPlMnc2GqZPk1TCCIlT4xRvewNe46e4ss2KG4m46tLDR jSfHpa+tfDzu6MsX5PLzZhsDyZYmQAZPTk0exuGTS21uRmo4+ctfvWi+Ig5oHHF75Yep G1+s7Ri0ycuJHVMn3zD36EaLgvW2Yn3dl4Vg5ok9UaKiON/IAU8QKK/b510fjDbNNZEW WE8rBZ4mkzreO/vDMydZVTE+MlLcXHDoaeVaMpAqOfpTGteorMgTjUG75AiNt/Wyi5Qs L9OlFPv0wN3JXAzxoY0d1VcBgeIaGifMrdhGZBS3hAEWVzWvm/TtZAiM7nuKPRzEDL+Q LjFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531yrArCeJ9bO1cMZtHpy5ApgQ5fHlMlE5I6PksGE/9ywO4XXoR5 pG0SShSXvPV6QkYIaYVh/U93yLH6X/U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxMoMu+GLecaVSiQwiOSqgg13K5itz8WO20vdya5AmvKO7Q+WSWEuP/ZCe/hGk4wB2ZmwNiw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:154:: with SMTP id 81mr8912424wmb.23.1593279720913; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm10553106wmh.36.2020.06.27.10.42.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <87zh8ol9qp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200623151323.29639-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <20200623152139.512-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <87zh8ol9qp.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:41:59 +0200 Message-ID: <86y2o8be3c.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=dZr5rSUe; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: PvO9YrcGcc0Y Hi Ludo, Thank you for the review. On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 19:05, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> - `(("url" . ,(list->vector >> + `(("urls" . ,(list->vector >> (resolve >> (match uri >> ((? string? url) (list url)) > > Is this change OK for Repology? Or should we keep =E2=80=9Curl=E2=80=9D = in addition to > =E2=80=9Curls=E2=80=9D? >From what I understood of their API [1] when I checked it, I may say yes. := -) Well, I do not think that repology parses the field 'sources'. 1: https://repology.org/addrepo > There=E2=80=99s no guarantee that =E2=80=98%guix-version=E2=80=99 is a co= mmit ID, so perhaps we > should do something like: Thanks for the tip, I did not know. I will sent a v2 with your suggestion or feel free to update the patch and push it. :-) Cheers, simon