From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6OcNNrsE7F6eOQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:20:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id QFrZMbsE7F4ROwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:20:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ADFE9404D3 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42250 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jm4lN-0001Sp-2r for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:20:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jm4lG-0001Sb-Ef for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:20:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jm4lG-0000Yv-48 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jm4lF-0007lX-Uk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:20:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#41882] Guix configuration file? Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41882 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 41882@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 41882-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41882.159252598629825 (code B ref 41882); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:20:01 +0000 Received: (at 41882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2020 00:19:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54700 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jm4l0-0007ky-EP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:19:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:41900) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jm4kx-0007kj-Dm for 41882@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:19:46 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id q2so5501170wrv.8 for <41882@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 17:19:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4bUFDoC8BBBSiNIvj8YpCwpBqMerQkZfG6OXc4YJCdo=; b=WebkoriXvLl9FOppClJ8zMu1Q9qDKQbMgKxwVRKlkljSCNl/+Hv5cgIbJfM3GVMJIW 2vBrZJ5z9nwqa8WCbFqym16cga3zsV5DZeEY2d0w9Lgv0nh82b2E51FG2Vvu922A80rK AJtrGRjELmLAo2r/IydkOLCJM3qsf3h8Qdr0udZdLOMcWCFUoIgQ7p6iHChFfPikQz/z YNVR6ANPi56MT4wS29G4EadxLwxg6FIv319ZchXN9Z2SKw6u7WiCB9PcDophMKH/CDM0 CDpie6rHV9RCJDr0qUA1+9fcubrdvfu/P9lC5yv9DdqJgpoSAoqzfYSoklHqHDHXrmtv 2Ykw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4bUFDoC8BBBSiNIvj8YpCwpBqMerQkZfG6OXc4YJCdo=; b=YYZzZcrtrn5VECXx1ny4ODK0hOYp/ectxk0uNvsUQ9IEDsUWvL/vuDOjLskaPkW9ZI GdlljwthecbxjMFsMp7eO4n6YzV4TtU3lNRH4gGgmULti2ow1xmK/VBQfArtX6DM1BF9 bpK4XsZVIAgJQrLY+UR67OG1JV16RsWIhB+Nt/W79R2knLxDLt0FazvzVVf+B+RKm4tm altU/VdkopMsGt9vILr2RERi499BHPkRGJcP+VUQqLC0dUNnZRxAcp94gSqStxGnqUQr qmjsBibL1WtwtA419Z/J91NzrQKCSWx6uvBTjKuemqZaesFFl+SuvT8lYZKrGbj2q0Bb 2YOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531//p/JUkhARnkRc3VeqTMTthovtN/MeIPlEpT9RJnzq74Vf60W soTtgmtZ3na9nJPqOWw+ndunnxvuTac= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycxrr57JqfqQZFFranDfUsc8ClQxeVmvZp6vUoPfKpWZqShLXhm+/3W/mvtjlIMiPR+3/new== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f308:: with SMTP id i8mr991048wro.355.1592525977183; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 17:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c66sm5296490wma.20.2020.06.18.17.19.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 17:19:36 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <20200618235213.utb3sk6la7mmhqsx@gravity> References: <20200615210343.18964-1-kuba@kadziolka.net> <87lfkmrqi7.fsf@gnu.org> <20200618235213.utb3sk6la7mmhqsx@gravity> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 02:19:35 +0200 Message-ID: <86v9jnvre0.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=WebkoriX; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-TUID: bEt9SPcvmrb/ Dear, As well, I am still starting to have some issue with the new machinery and my workflow is less flowing. :-) For example, I regularly type "guix pull --commit=3D -p /tmp/foo" to test something and now I need more than sometimes to type "--allow-downgrades". And I have not intensively used "guix time-machine" since this new machinery but I have the feeling that "--disable-authentication" will be necessary too in my workflow. In the light of your message and a previous one by Ludo... On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 01:52, Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka wrote: >> It may be that setting GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS=3D--allow-downgrades actually >> works, though it=E2=80=99s a bit of a hack. > > I have found the time to test this. Unfortunately, while it does make > `guix pull' work, it breaks other commands, such as `guix build'. On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 11:27, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > I don=E2=80=99t think =E2=80=9Callow-downgrade?=E2=80=9D should be a prop= erty of , > because conceptually it=E2=80=99s an unrelated piece of configuration. S= o I > think it=E2=80=99s configuration that belongs elsewhere, but there=E2=80= =99s no > configuration file for =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99 etc. ...maybe it is time to have a configuration file for Guix. Something to specify default options command by command. Or maybe some alias. Maybe something like ~/.config/guix/config.scm. WDYT? All the best, simon