From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53205)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1duLuR-00053m-95
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:02:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1duLuM-0008EL-Sn
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:02:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39835)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1duLuM-0008E2-QK
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:02:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1duLuM-0007P7-9L
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:02:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#28504] [PATCH] cuirass: Add --listen command line option.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28504.B28504.150584050728441@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <20170918200207.28095-1-janneke@gnu.org> <87shfj56wc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87shfi1z7j.fsf@gnu.org> <864lrymylm.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87o9q61vg2.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <87o9q61vg2.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 19:01:42 +0200
Message-ID: <86tvzy4o7d.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Cc: 28504@debbugs.gnu.org


> Thanks!  I was just thinking: to make this work we need cuirass master,
> so I should probably add the attached cuirass update first?

It seems like a good idea, but that would impact bayfront who uses Guix
cuirass package. So we should maybe wait for Ludo and Ricardo to give
their opinion ?

Mathieu