From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 9N1yMkYQI2C1EAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 22:44:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id AEPGLUYQI2CNaAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 22:44:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A989403AA for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 22:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48726 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9bk5-0003zN-2D for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:44:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9bjn-0003zB-Ce for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:44:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9bjl-0008BJ-Mv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:44:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9bjl-0003Vq-J4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:44:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46376] [PATCH] gnu: tesseract-ocr: update to 4.1.1) Resent-From: Jelle Licht Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 22:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46376 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Andy Tai Cc: 46376@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46376-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46376.161291059513436 (code B ref 46376); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 22:44:01 +0000 Received: (at 46376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2021 22:43:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9bj0-0003Ue-NT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:43:14 -0500 Received: from mail1.fsfe.org ([217.69.89.151]:57398) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9biv-0003UR-Oi for 46376@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:43:12 -0500 From: Jelle Licht In-Reply-To: References: <86a6sep7h0.fsf@posteo.net> <867dnhpi85.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 23:43:06 +0100 Message-ID: <86sg6450cl.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.26 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict), No valid DKIM" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 39A989403AA X-Spam-Score: -2.26 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: XdBKPiJdSyBC Hi Andy, Andy Tai writes: > Hi, I updated the patch to only build in serial, with "-j 1" > > and with this, everything, including tests, builds successfully. No such luck, for me at least. Are you certain you got it to build on your end? Could you try with `--check`? I've had to work out the following things: - Patched out "" and "" to refer to "baseapi.h" and "helpers.h" in "unittest/pagesegmode_test.cc". - Make sure the check phase takes place after running "make training" in a phase. I still ended up with several failing tests, courtesy of it running unsupported instructions on my cpu (educated guess: avx etc). Nothing comes easy, I guess. Thanks, - Jelle