From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2AhQKVWV/2JpHwEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:51:17 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id +FE8KVWV/2L89wAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:51:17 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E50E48565 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:51:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44152 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oP2P6-000646-0t for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:51:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oP2Os-00063r-Up for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:51:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oP2Os-0005xg-LY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:51:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oP2Os-0004uo-8w for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#57055] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add guile-srfi-146. Resent-From: pukkamustard Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57055 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxime Devos Cc: 57055@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57055-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57055.166091704818873 (code B ref 57055); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:51:02 +0000 Received: (at 57055) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2022 13:50:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57617 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oP2Oe-0004uL-0g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:50:48 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:59303) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oP2Ob-0004u2-37 for 57055@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:50:46 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41528240103 for <57055@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:50:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1660917039; bh=n43te35WERIBlrFO+I7ibjQkpthKbVAouASYq3/Tzyw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=gbtaQCOMXhNWMJO/8rx7qTRb0wA/EUq4H2YBxV/F1nKIPAEi5CU9J9vAHmPMZFGsj +SYSPtJ5Fvm5RpiLLftUSwv4/ToMKcKL43jevmkv/d5bJLTu5pO/4XFlNs4/nRZk1e HYELOdc/5GaMtXvyforIxu5cSuzKNVVlNfakHJgloocZEp4kkMkL+O+hnFx+Q5MlQ+ x8O4gCslw8S8//RtIC/4YJcCKLdY3VGca721073CS4BPVWncAos46gCPPj9E/p4HtI sOhFOxBTZAhm6oW72B7snxFGRQEC0wZCwaV8GtbdLWwhmxWHUkQ63EwPcNXaZ1xF7S AGnsjhHDwHsqw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4M8NSF3TS6z9rxH; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 15:50:34 +0200 (CEST) References: <20220808083254.16059-1-pukkamustard@posteo.net> <20220808083601.16323-1-pukkamustard@posteo.net> <20220808083601.16323-2-pukkamustard@posteo.net> <5ac83e05-863f-7d81-6f86-b738a7ae3fa2@telenet.be> <86y1vy7uvq.fsf@posteo.net> <8aafcdc2-cb1a-6d38-1832-52fd53fc85ec@telenet.be> From: pukkamustard Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:41:10 +0000 In-reply-to: <8aafcdc2-cb1a-6d38-1832-52fd53fc85ec@telenet.be> Message-ID: <86sflse40m.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1660917077; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=sLYE7ul6lGhNGwynXHd+EVnx9M9nz66noslAKjEeNRU=; b=DuRUGVNQqdBn1OJBZWAyF/HR9BTVjROuMjKS14fiRxHSIpsWr0n4K9q3Ti7t4mEBsyYmbL 2Fc2FVZfttqL25DZy632jtXcLYBKszQxrRwiVFyAjg30Bl4qS/GmhpfobMI5278UaPGuRb qBSQ1yC/xAZt079cN3ZcuitKgPqAz2QQgwSe+B8NCFlolgnq6JUa7mDZjuc4v/mZDT4xHp ds+hfL3uGmlYpPo99zn8jL+mdZKxMKBC7r9FDV0oRE4UIGBAwMK9KFd/uWp02LEtKi/vgj B4fWKGfKXtjbzZXkxcaLjgT5haid7c/dWP7lmZkGLCREiML+vvDQUDMCN5WKxA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1660917077; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gMReyrwYxsbqHDZVpGdSBreMsAAVhmdY+zMPs1yfOeD6JCprGj4PsKiwnJRspL2bIraIsn L0kQIy1Kr9IhJeOLGc9QLwA+toYTeiyVG/aLWU81Xp6d0FXbjchoyvezydin5Xtasb/v9o yNUWyXGggIFVWkmqEN3o2/LZqwnu0zo/wPey882H965NohW+cf8Wnr4yF6Vfs4cr4f90B8 KxWjsiKGU0ySNzfgXQDmclv6ekp1BGuyY+bLX9bA3wKbyND8ObeCILyyNHDgsxXFly/aBD MoCJ/Rc/5X4sMDDywRVegLB5iLnr702/9VuqX6azXxjCtVoNv9yEtxrmKK4Jxw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=gbtaQCOM; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 5.95 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=gbtaQCOM; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E50E48565 X-Spam-Score: 5.95 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: vZk43mE0tMDB Sorry for the delayed response. I seem to have missed this mail. Maxime Devos writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > On 08-08-2022 14:43, pukkamustard wrote: > > + (license license:lgpl3+))) > > There are also some (ISC?) bits on > . > > Yes, the sample SRFI implementation is licensed under ISC. Afaiu, > there's no problem in relicensing this as LGPL-3.0-or-later. I think a > lot of the guile-srfi-* libraries do this. > > I have looked at license text, and it states that it allows 'sublicensing', but it doesn't say anything about relicensing (except maybe for > the "deal in the Software without restriction"?). > > As such, I think it would be safer to just include license:isc in the list. I'm no legal expert, but I think I am free to distribute it only under LGPL-3.0-or-later (and not also ISC). And I prefer to do so. For prior cases see modules/srfi/srfi-71.scm as distributed with Guile. The file contains a SRFI sample implementation with the same ISC license header. It seems to be fine to relicense modules distributed with Guile as LGPL-3.0-or-later. In the Guix package definition for Guile only license:lgpl3+ is listed (and not license:isc). Cheers, pukkamustard