From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id MDocOGc9v2MtUwEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 23:51:19 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id kI8gOGc9v2MSdwAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 23:51:19 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B4711A2D for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 23:51:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pFjw1-0006tJ-BU; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:51:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pFjvy-0006oa-Fm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:51:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pFjvy-0004QK-7I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:51:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pFjvx-0004as-L3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#52109] [PATCH] gnu: Add unrar-free. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 22:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52109 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxim Cournoyer , Liliana Marie Prikler Cc: kiasoc5 , 52109@debbugs.gnu.org, Foo Chuan Wei Received: via spool by 52109-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52109.167347742517612 (code B ref 52109); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 22:51:01 +0000 Received: (at 52109) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2023 22:50:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44148 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pFjvN-0004a0-6W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:50:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com ([209.85.221.46]:38596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pFjvK-0004ZY-CV for 52109@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:50:22 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id az7so16480141wrb.5 for <52109@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:50:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=iOuByNbR/pD4Hij6OoPBDegPFuMgW3zbvt097bIChfE=; b=prbTNYjORR8ziuoQ6GJfhO22YBr51l0L/8FWLvQ8rfa5FE8wsEsbq1STK9rc6W/Neo S6Pl218cAOutdInKzobTQbgwEzFGsoA++f9uuTOY3cVL7T80YRrPvVWsiv7DMWGe6HkE E9g0VevffTPnOY9MnM1tcCjTrb53Vd1IYh4ljc0YxTa1SvvY+HShcFnO9t5jfeFSJuZr ySfy4PNM2vm4wH3at1D6KIIvBFiPDYK6lQe1akOL/fTqbxTNmTeRN+tuQrSEu6NxY4Mk CyuILRXX+wIi/0l3/y/1g7iIOHEQtvAOAJYs2SRdLJOgx7QQf2SZI0xHvdeMmLJP9jlJ 9beg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iOuByNbR/pD4Hij6OoPBDegPFuMgW3zbvt097bIChfE=; b=7915FzUibUaMfwt6WrbRhsa6vHdM+r9DxXxu0Cv8+i48Zt2827Ttkn7mwHJmFZ8H1P fV6wBhtC2AnGD9N0Mz9BDoPOzuEuH5uqZpkaWjWrbnXXw5jVm1bszpNhRkVlzBqOXiU0 uKIec6XKOj8GV3iC3hOpeLuT5kne3f8TrtcZCxAj+SWcTNKvX+jRzM1+HLvI8xDYWxYS RRzzN0Fe07lrGrKQAVz6N4tgl7TCkeFHODo2RfJ01ixbmEXtV2IoazY+MtNH8foIIZIx e4FGmJ+IdSpZ3b3GapIGap5mblbu36sAlGneTrY2o67w3oW2fnHDdmdlKrPqQH0X0t6I uSzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krS/VbucMjQZlUuB9+go6RoohJTora55qZac6+gslEq5la/l12F 7zuJD9pLQhg6yOj8op6tylo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsyC5oU3+psJ+1hRJDxTyVo2jXPOgYRExVhQrAAjOaPEMKR9s+FrvDDlgEEqctL8S+IBmLXGg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4842:0:b0:2bb:62bf:f5cb with SMTP id n2-20020a5d4842000000b002bb62bff5cbmr2522910wrs.4.1673477416629; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:50:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i10-20020adff30a000000b0024228b0b932sm17894838wro.27.2023.01.11.14.50.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:50:16 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <87358il4l0.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87358rxgjk.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <325c0ef4-63ad-b45d-96ae-2cf248c37548@disroot.org> <871qoavyn2.fsf@gmail.com> <9336884519247fe7c9a9cf0d532eb8a79b954a7f.camel@gmail.com> <87358il4l0.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 23:31:01 +0100 Message-ID: <86sfgg1z6i.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=prbTNYjO; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1673477479; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RRYe4Hg1IsO49f5lSZ6UeJcG/iNW11Plc3qtfzmkjc09nD1XzcMyOO51Kjy3kwhU1+l1Ck UEDzU7BJWXI39XT9A0iDIwgg76PztbNpQJvHHvVjNJiAY0/qG/2KBJD0Mt+Kn0GkyJwcEh kF0Pd/y0gezOyv2XDUNs2qrXJF9DChMKEllrGJmh+Zae6sjyn9eAr4UcDLvDWDYB9pFGAb NNaUgl/OaIncY7xlblQU4/eXGMZdUmwQmC5rzbcrf94vHdbcKk42YyrHAjvnSogJ6ne1g0 QH0yzH7RBFI5HAy81WHHCeL8qx1zo9AwWwX8E//QOD08CgQWZaWmm30Ro83SFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1673477479; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=iOuByNbR/pD4Hij6OoPBDegPFuMgW3zbvt097bIChfE=; b=ClacAncn5ufcN/9NOlsYnnsPZBMcDeuHecQk4h5P7eHd6ocKk52Sn2lye1dqzXUUklehzr cYCgCP2uDvKH8nGXXtJtjqnOl/dr4SelUK3WO3UbG2ObuHThpoQ2snosx43fT4BYczCm7Q 32dMMq7yDx6D9rQQ+BoskggFVXKzgid0YHiiYrZZUKWJgYmBPF8GsOpE3h4WGhbyiYg10T 13qnHFoE14kUfgGQqZXsmqXrYgVrgakc1UsHjrtJ8QXQq9iWJ5MjFjhug6Iq8vjwsb2/Mm 91hMXFED2zB2xbyZc81EPjxV8Vof1s3C2H+Y9BhE7/z/4hW+bvsGNG/YjhRU3g== X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 97B4711A2D X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=prbTNYjO; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.10 X-Spam-Score: -1.10 X-TUID: A8+cQ4RiNFJF Hi all, On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 11:47, Maxim Cournoyer w= rote: > What we are discussing here is whether there's a problem or not with the > FSDG and the name 'unrar-free'. Given the argument that 'unrar-free' > package could steer users toward 'unrar' non-free (which is not > available in Guix) is a bit of a stretch (as you admitted), I don't > think it's ground to refuse its inclusion in Guix. I agree with Maxim=E2=80=99s arguments. From my point of view, unrar-free respects FSDG =E2=80=93 and since it is present in Trisquel, I assume this understanding of FSDG is shared =E2=80=93 to some extent. Even, I would say the Liliana=E2=80=99s opposite argument: it liberates user from the non-free unrar by offering a free alternative. And it is the case for all the free re-implementations, no? Therefore, I do not see what is the blocker. :-) Cheers, simon