From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id mHf8OZtA+2FIEQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 03:40:27 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id SDlgN5tA+2EwkgAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 03:40:27 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D9F2E262 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 03:40:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51992 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFS2q-0006aa-Pc for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:40:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFS2U-0006ZW-Ns for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:40:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFS2U-0007JQ-Dk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:40:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFS2U-0000jI-Bu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#28690] provide a lib output for boost Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 02:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28690 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 28690@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: rekado@elephly.net, post@thomasdanckaert.be, ludo@gnu.org, dave.love@manchester.ac.uk, roel@gnu.org Received: via spool by 28690-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28690.16438559992768 (code B ref 28690); Thu, 03 Feb 2022 02:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 28690) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2022 02:39:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54046 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFS2Q-0000iY-KA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:39:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com ([209.85.128.52]:55925) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFS2O-0000i7-4r for 28690@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:39:56 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id r7so790118wmq.5 for <28690@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 18:39:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1E6q4K+qg4wlmayd8w00Q0CWPTOeNDEzw6yh9XoC4L0=; b=ha8VByLkMQEH3NwIHqh4CEt2XgESAxN5EnOku4NKHUPGmdfIIMfprC8Lqw7AaeW6DH 7C1zDmkUaSxkSS1DlwBQM4epb29dTui8pUCp4ILvg31xBnfnDHkzJzVUTErHqWJgt4OJ k+SAhg0lFnbr1c5HzVghxVteoWqdRQoJww9qb1G1AmAu+fMEcJWUykRTUX/cMgNqQuy/ 3+Qk2TAFJfKkR2yKCHg4w7+2RLrzXRlAvzgOxKAfX9RupWj78QGqHRnnlyFOWsUGjZpm zYSnK8sM4ztDKjV8ZSsZ+S4uDgnxn6iNQ2+1GP/TkA6iZfED/u3gCx1YFNlmg5J4JaBU WYNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1E6q4K+qg4wlmayd8w00Q0CWPTOeNDEzw6yh9XoC4L0=; b=Y3jWgEi93Kp5MQoTftCIhZnk35TTguxfRxrYHneFG7MJePFelPGg6gkcCwsSR+mUm6 9sOwMPBx99MJZYCyCIX5cd9365jDcMKHY78RENnysFPj3365vMdQge6XIRY0Eu0j7Qkn JQa9+1P+zRlYWSS910NxVPwHaciHhM0VFoQx6d7RYwSWKcc28IUNfQhmauVALzSneepw Cwrw2Pb+ohxV6YwiWhQCs5OPAXF6PHHthPJPeCT9plnouFclQQVHaiNeX1Zck/O++fLW K+qhJdhS2lvxh+IuUCNmdqYlSjX1PBDSOUNxbdHMjRuWzIEpaF42fymxe7nUCpE1Q8Th 7yBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BW5sxTuz+QTmzz3MUbO76ar35jCS0tQSs87F0lSKJDr47IAJS 1fqa5rLJZmAuHJqBsHr1B6E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx70+CgrJJvkkAuYLhhZD+4hp7e0D26H7GuUZ/GtlF2IZ986zJSmHT770frljKPhkWgHFDXsw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4b13:: with SMTP id y19mr8284172wma.129.1643855990066; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 18:39:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm6552706wmq.41.2022.02.02.18.39.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 18:39:49 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun References: <87d164b36m.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <86sftriqr3.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 03:30:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86sftriqr3.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2022 16:45:20 +0100") Message-ID: <86mtj81y3b.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1643856027; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=1E6q4K+qg4wlmayd8w00Q0CWPTOeNDEzw6yh9XoC4L0=; b=FrSC+lxuqx22PJg6q3nQ/5NS7d5+XAdE0T2JaCB5Ysod8q6UDSDW5npq+td/5BVaCPrqdO /GKlAZRMM1RAgIL1JHXi9HgrEGlLXEgQtVuUH8Jtf2SKVoRjwXrsvlPFSM4IDCkFg51wZd KgPGS2p7EOfWkSHsVmYEGWAhcfLWBUsPX1bcX1evMgWKLz4rbnkoao+tR8oYwPk+xr9GVh 92Q4A3txayIqXctJQ5nMAQ6d4kT1ROgeQPjwi7p62YN8ZkjK1Y8cll1IQN5WJuSiBlgrz2 t8CZEXK8Q/ARTCElwvyCHJCd0adVByD3t36nmOAQBv5uSY3SVPFFl02cK0/ByA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1643856027; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=PkMc7zSgMRGQiksQPHQDzMENosBn5NNKghiz8EUxJ4YcTh2POI/6ChFf4o2QQSAkmtqr6A CKTh3alo91rF9EhZmsGnQaDlJnWZQd2BPYDC5t5qqorUVc5mWVue6DJr3XcVY48HZdfl5F DHbO/QVicvwhFj0RIxdwkvx7w4Ysv4Fs53ndNH72EHfhQof3oFFelQ5XZaBt9T8PiiU8Qq 72X2+6ikSP1ofPKexcXPWRuRD/0HFq8cgEsLIux8mP8/G4s/EXtixcYuKN3evG6ykyNtLA iq1ZATid7mp1c931MegD+p9OAAJGWTjsfjlidRx5ODfx1CQMmYe8gGOPQ3eOnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ha8VByLk; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.03 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=ha8VByLk; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5D9F2E262 X-Spam-Score: -2.03 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 0rEKBxMeLQ1Q Hi, On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 16:45, zimoun wrote: > This patch #28690 [1] is about adding an output to boost. The aim is to > reduce the closure size. > > The last message if from Dec. 2017 and indicates some issues. > > > 1: > > > On Tue, 03 Oct 2017 at 17:34, Dave Love wrot= e: [...] >> The lib package is 17MiB, and the headers are 108MiB. > > Now, the size is: [...] > total: 262.0 MiB > On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 at 09:19, Thomas Danckaert = wrote: >> The updated list and a few patches are on my other computer, I'll post t= hem >> when I get home. > > Therefore, if I understand correctly, some work remains. The question > is: is it worth to complete such work about adding more outputs to > boost? Since some work remains and it is not clear if it is worth to complete such work about adding more outputs to boost, I plan to mark this report as =E2=80=99donewontfix=E2=80=99. Let me know if it is worth to keep it op= en. Cheers, simon