From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gAOIJtaltV8WIAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:53:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id QB5DItaltV9/fAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:53:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DC8994011C for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52592 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfWK4-00060E-N9 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:53:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfWJy-0005zk-2l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:53:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfWJx-0005wz-Pa for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:53:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfWJx-0001n5-OP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44199] [PATCH 0/1] An origin method for GNUnet FS URI's Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44199 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix patch To: Maxime Devos , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 44199-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44199-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D44199.16057399646859 (code D ref 44199); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 22:53:01 +0000 Received: (at 44199-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2020 22:52:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfWJg-0001mZ-Hr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:52:44 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:54780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfWJf-0001mL-B4 for 44199-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:52:43 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id d142so4995180wmd.4 for <44199-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:52:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BMViijnhI5eNUaCbcg03zMNx2Glh9RG+XTYzIMxi2/8=; b=ofg5CJzz7tjRr5/jOfX7o07TAIa0gFGf27kQzdpo2dXGezKHhd8dgQyEBu/dn4ftqQ fZUWwNpVImDnM0h1VN49c6/LuFSfnS+nRFU2lzsqmj3wJvFtzR4whADAGaV4wfGvuwfQ sOxld5RketbMzUE4zw3OSaW+8vVxsMPjwTVvDTpa5mpZ4kJy36V69SZ3DniHQXkge1LG FTmchXfHyEDgsg/scxJXAWwPBXu4yJyDQBS2WyiT4O2De5a340qTKgg4bv4stn0JttKW 8dVakbDu5uHsP46K1Nw4JyXFeEGHANvpfjXtZpfZ54FEGr8IXUxjRLv5vn11JIzvajDJ XVYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BMViijnhI5eNUaCbcg03zMNx2Glh9RG+XTYzIMxi2/8=; b=tImUZ6h1dm6MylfElZ+yvFo5Ho370vFJh4Qcx+bz1aKZn2Ne+/7FFveVObko8S90cm dpRlgVrZcghbiYE/khe1hobxr7H7pINoW8rcYtswN90WV8c3Y0hRJayaPo2pYiyplHxW 4ErzKgUdfLO9ZIdABEZCg7VZaAfvGj0S2OWgqXNkpze4KoISUhoWjObo+SFAmH/MgqMu BfQYg/LOic2aijAqw86o00epWOi9QmAlHCvqfZgFJSih0bMY5F1n5BeOjXLEYPvOpghK I69dubUxtouLg8ZWxitdGnBPG58Fny5V9JGDtBbBA88xE2nDf8GU0JwrWOkxE9yltuK6 Xwyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hxAkGwkOg2iZ2PIV6m5LF1uNfy52fMD2QREOdcD+8rSmB2oUa N59IR40vDI0X+FONc5XUz4/G3sm4F2fF5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKLEPYMwm4jYPfNy45qInz6kE51+fK93zS/6DI6ztGA5AX484PF2a1N+UYAjqJWnqEOekf0g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c11a:: with SMTP id w26mr1430504wmi.78.1605739957278; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:52:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b4sm5975733wmc.1.2020.11.18.14.52.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:52:36 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: References: <5c72bcb9c86934deda97d952eb5cd459e615b313.camel@student.kuleuven.be> <87mtzi5nni.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:42:35 +0100 Message-ID: <86lfey2so4.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ofg5CJzz; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: xyYo7/4v6j4y Hi Maxime, On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 20:14, Maxime Devos wrote: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s schreef op zo 15-11-2020 om 22:13 [+0100]: >> [snip] >> While I think this is a laudable goal, I=E2=80=99m reluctant to including >> GNUnet >> support just yet because, as stated in recent release announcements, >> GNUnet is still in flux and not considered =E2=80=9Cproduction ready=E2= =80=9D. >>=20 >> So I think we should keep it around and revisit this issue when >> GNUnet >> is considered =E2=80=9Cstable=E2=80=9D. WDYT? > > Sounds reasonable to me. There are also a lot of missing parts: a > service definition for Guix System, findings substitutes, finding > sources by hash (the one Guix uses, not the GNUnet hash) ..., so it > isn't like my rudimentary patch was usable on large scale anyway. Therefore, I am closing. Feel free to reopen once GNUnet is considered as (more) =E2=80=9Cstable=E2=80=9D. Thank you for your contribution. All the best, simon