From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id Of6ZMzOoiF+GIAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:51:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iLIELzOoiF+yOAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:51:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 636849404C5 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54064 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kT9HN-000696-Rn for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:51:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kT9HC-0005za-Il for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:51:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kT9HC-0007ad-7e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:51:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kT9HC-0001By-6w for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#39588] gnu: Add mpich, scalapack-mpich, mumps-mpich, pt-scotch-mpich, python-mpi4py-mpich Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Maurice =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A9mond?= , 39588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39588.16027914114520 (code B ref 39588); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 19:51:02 +0000 Received: (at 39588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2020 19:50:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kT9GN-0001Aq-9N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:50:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com ([209.85.221.51]:37569) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kT9GL-0001AW-2v for 39588@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:50:10 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id h7so5157781wre.4 for <39588@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:50:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=usCPC2I4nc0md25szounkGgMU+edIuPIOtNCZxfj1LE=; b=meBvGgYdiDzil0cvnfEGCgDSZCYkrDitZdS8tULMS03bNdXSCe0yzFxz4Ndx2qfKau uOH4bmVoV9yWUwb400AXOqPdRhQcwWQTQnZSRqwiohfFGyWey2dxu8eMeAmJg1IOrcEb huw+OGo/SbnMF5D+4QLkH6UNYhIXNkJgvKynPs008DWvx15knSkBQflDdz57ntakz2zs UG2aSLPR0Trv1MWs7ct7TAsk2vm4NRS5x0GfWpLLWeevKqosDSwpE75p1EKr8rTWvFUj 3mPHTvgeutXdfcQrTjNFRvhhXYwoeaK4/3livLYRAiUuF008re7fow0W7t6vEo64Vg/f nPqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=usCPC2I4nc0md25szounkGgMU+edIuPIOtNCZxfj1LE=; b=WmepOBGJhPUVhEsHSXHDzRQy2Qm0BcqZKAuh7u1s8+LvnnwtpcGMXpl322NkXlc6mw FKnUi5YUYFuxlTL28iCdvaQwfUc6kYc/ly7dnusrb0nP2/5tLMp+W01Bilksr/6Ipf0T lyZAlVwOl46ufNDsR2Z1Au6IxNspq9j1k/6HR5uhIMsvVelZoJnkGM8be9DsdN5GfKV1 lv3FF+ahQgGmmKuKKj3RENfDiRgmp4ZWMAHMgORhqlaHxq2ZFARvMSQ7c9xH6PBELLm4 IYUPZeMo8NNSDzmHI9x+cKriefJ9CyykB0e9kz+6v0r2y77tOdeQ//tpuXDOgpTxbYiB unBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531to3JRsftikotIMhue16um1aiJYkp5cOfA4Kv8uivp4gH4SSPC ZRVvf9CCpqPPpkWAPzUEvQFpiDN0OQY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/4l7fKTUSJVx4DZT3mt4THHbGQeXvhA1aiKoesTUfEET4Lg6GbdiCxNXJH/mjC5/zmLcOKA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e80f:: with SMTP id o15mr6229201wrm.308.1602791402974; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u20sm88676wmm.29.2020.10.15.12.50.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:50:02 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun References: <87blq2rclk.fsf@inria.fr> <87o8tx3z2q.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeupd3t1.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:50:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87eeupd3t1.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:08:10 +0100") Message-ID: <861rhz1d7b.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=meBvGgYd; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: /dTH0ktREYNz Hi, Reliving the openmpi->mpich topic of #39588 [1]. 1: On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 10:08, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Well, for these particular patches, the variants are ok. >> But we should think about how to ease the variant generation of all the = chain. > > Well again there are things like =E2=80=98package-input-rewriting=E2=80= =99 that could > help: we could define a =E2=80=98package-with-mpich=E2=80=99 procedure. Now the =E2=80=9C#:deep?=E2=80=9D exists, does it make sense to implement t= his =E2=80=9Cpackage-with-mpich=E2=80=9D procedure? It could be helpful for HP= C people, isn=E2=80=99t? All the best, simon