From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4P+2CWVQ/F/MFwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:19:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id AEuRBWVQ/F8NLAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:19:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E114E9403AA for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51456 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyx6Z-0006z6-T1 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:19:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyx66-0006bd-NN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:19:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyx65-0004tG-No for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:19:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyx65-0005a8-Jy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:19:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#26489] [PATCH] substitute: Ignore bad responses. Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26489 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 26489-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26489.161037108221341 (code B ref 26489); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:19:01 +0000 Received: (at 26489) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2021 13:18:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyx57-0005Xx-A1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:18:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com ([209.85.221.46]:33853) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyx54-0005Xb-AQ for 26489@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:17:59 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id q18so16427322wrn.1 for <26489@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:17:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y3RvR8pdZe0DlnjtiJogenRpjcUOpjkXecQ6MxOScM4=; b=n8jykIVc/OAFe3FlHDFTeaLLtHZpcfMOLSPmdfv3bjee6n3uE5+WmOYoLi53dfERuT fEqCgmuFfGHfeaOBj3yUK5Yz43kwMSAZRYxPBfPDo6DFB0EYdlaxhUjs9+yuYzCE5gaW vrBqykELEAkeV25wJOD46yKdhme90lqEgcq4R0BdQGrjnFTIeTb4cSzn53FQYyt3uFiv 1H7+4LkkDEiRqZz6xez0iQ23Ji7d165IH5THxKeiLQluDZKYsb5BpYpoC82L47vQL6gF 5ChCU6b97cIupBN99Qz/MpJpKMOP2Z4+ETn11Bs68LGKpD0YxO5WHTIilciPbMA4jYP6 BZJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y3RvR8pdZe0DlnjtiJogenRpjcUOpjkXecQ6MxOScM4=; b=d00zNEa6uQKz6C5XcHOmJ1Y8N9FHXmoH6v1bPZmvtTjgjfoQhSwvugaerpJC7ahVcK Xdm0q+fa2DMwjqJBpNhLLEzBv4HhCod3Q41Vrd7Ge2tBCUU2H3sdFOYXI2KndKIDMAZU fcmbhYcTcMqpaFNXpYhBeS8xQCDMlreH0GoR6skSGEldc5/9VRwXo6ug/QiNRWnCKCUt gSxRLDhigTHev17tJqyMyBx3yvM48xGs/SIM22wqxooUdrG2rNs0M9FMpB2nCb9JAZ64 C//Ld1bssCd1jZjaNyYc+BBuCgfFMT5ZhYcAiSCZAWLsXIWkRg8RIdm5oIL/S4UVX6mg 2vWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533eLzqxSCgDJPCVllbAs1C7njPXASUGMpa1xyqkf9lwH5GjOO50 HxlzG5AKlpQ34kRPE3Tf6uE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwhReqEuuy223J1CLGvYQhIEHp/EUB/L4/Ureo8WD0Ti7zoryIF9nML7dvjnNQRPN/nmsYqdg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:43c3:: with SMTP id v3mr15909399wrr.184.1610371072583; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:17:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 125sm22590200wmc.27.2021.01.11.05.17.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:17:51 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun References: <20170414002755.32672-1-me@tobias.gr> <87lgr3gvqf.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9vc3eij.fsf@gnu.org> <861rfmvpdn.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8io8ul7.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:08:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o8io8ul7.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:39:48 +0100") Message-ID: <861rertyd5.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 26489@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.25 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=n8jykIVc; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E114E9403AA X-Spam-Score: -1.25 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: hZ0oLLa4v5yw Hi Tobias, On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 14:39, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> I=E2=80=99d be happy with a patch along these lines! >> >> Tobias, do you plan to rework/rebase it? > > In the meantime, commit 5ff521452b9ec2aae9ed8e4bb7bdc250a581f203 added > =E2=80=98bad-response=E2=80=99 handling (and more). We should take a clo= ser look, but > it may be that this issue is now addressed. Since you reported the use-case and the patch, could you confirm that the commit 5ff521 addresses the issue? I think it does but maybe I am missing something; probably I am. :-) Cheers, simon