From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id iPGpMd5+DGPFeAEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:54:54 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id EDPMMd5+DGNmZwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:54:54 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69E5B15069 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56000 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSaXj-0005bA-V7 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 04:54:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSaWw-0005an-J0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 04:54:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSaWw-0001oP-AH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 04:54:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oSaWw-0005OD-5S for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 04:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#57055] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add guile-srfi-146. Resent-From: pukkamustard Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57055 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxime Devos Cc: 57055@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 57055-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57055.166176323820707 (code B ref 57055); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 57055) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2022 08:53:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oSaWr-0005Nu-QQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 04:53:58 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:55307) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oSaWq-0005Nh-3q for 57055@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 04:53:57 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A78240103 for <57055@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:53:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1661763229; bh=uH2NqoiL1Si0kdCTkQxEIHGHf9z55NHU+/g+z43ooCk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=kmk8Fg9j7qib06EsKqUkWIFRLcJaaaVjkHMuWTbgAoVi7O39Cj/6oD4uLAWJbRyQL pgto/j2mGZHdWbG2AEuGOEJ3iY4+JYN+/4QSsn5Eb2c4+Phrja7mj5FOR8iSdBpzC5 7NSAt85pZAnf4oaMGZU3GDYMs+LyHlQypY74w7U5lhk6Govx0uLjJsMFohYcmZpJDT 44F0ExAE7ubr8JwpRB9FZxhEDAqsYWpdgzNwN7PaZxT8s7mY79GabGV7XWzf2cQ5AZ Z+CZPeOqQ4qnV4N/wv3z4hGm0AO+IwWr0T9J4uHOL0vrgWAJGzi/Ex/TbxwMHhS119 WF2YKWZ1EosxA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MGPP80Btwz6tmF; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:53:45 +0200 (CEST) References: <20220808083254.16059-1-pukkamustard@posteo.net> <20220808083601.16323-1-pukkamustard@posteo.net> <20220808083601.16323-2-pukkamustard@posteo.net> <5ac83e05-863f-7d81-6f86-b738a7ae3fa2@telenet.be> <86y1vy7uvq.fsf@posteo.net> <8aafcdc2-cb1a-6d38-1832-52fd53fc85ec@telenet.be> <86sflse40m.fsf@posteo.net> From: pukkamustard Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:48:54 +0000 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <861qszzazr.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1661763294; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=uH2NqoiL1Si0kdCTkQxEIHGHf9z55NHU+/g+z43ooCk=; b=dM50fZZsWlob8KsSQOv3/3AKcrYka4dxS4jQhmAQoBHL2CJgpRaxSUoGFIrhFmtIIE0oHS asvs08CloxwG8Ofhkf/X+fDxuFVXHBGMD+qdXd8BoJbhGieqesTWOWleXwBZEDJWTujuyG 8VRZpuuYMqYSwP8VzE5fRfmYbsiEdT7wSuAcMgavOJGkTg6JMS37eWpqrvwQFIzjqtpq0t isqr1l4/o6qouqfcZ6Vm0cY0ycJ8UJTcvoqKUp6e4kKtdm6YAUy6SilGP/Jn/W3V84f/BF +oCL29w3q9o8m+gEPfWIo+rzgIEXJoxXu/DdRPh+pZJEmqBpn2dODBDp2PDS4w== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1661763294; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mPdDgQG3GW2/e3Tc1jF+/Lo6RnmeG9oPmvyzosJPcFEDKH/ncm+5GamejHKWGWWCfPffTV Scr8hnk0OVXV85gLSCikjArsnHs0C8Is1j+ufovUt88OQoD2P+IzZINJoP/J+kg++CWDee vuMyGeUorYWVgPohE99sgO6jpNtysBa+rhdXWPoGXGaPZehVakBe57JC1ni6J8c9vCZi1h Z98U4PS9M6en8cAVDxjHoXNKNTijAmeDbHLR0/lYLBu+KRjzBaZs12VirXEbiEU5DNGaXk PVSYC2pf0BxTuUdVtkeAx56IfXvV9hKOJCFMVOjDMvKyPylXrlFegjn2GjgWMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=kmk8Fg9j; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 5.20 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=kmk8Fg9j; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 69E5B15069 X-Spam-Score: 5.20 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: sulMhEmiy50a Hi, I think I finally understand your reasoning (also thanks to the thread on guix-devel - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-08/msg00167.html) and agree. Will send in V3 shortly with license:isc added to the list of licenses with a comment. Thank you for your elaborations and patience. - pukkamustard Maxime Devos writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > On 19-08-2022 15:41, pukkamustard wrote: > >> I'm no legal expert, but I think I am free to distribute it only >> under LGPL-3.0-or-later (and not also ISC). And I prefer to do so. > Sure, go ahead and distribute it as LGPL-3.0-or-later, but I don't see > how it follows that license:isc should be removed from the license > list. > > However, to me it seems inaccurate that you do not have to follow the > ISC by following the LGPL-3.0-or-later instead. The ISC has a line: >> ;; [...] The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall >> be included >> ;; in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. [...] > Even if ISC permits relicensing, I would assume you will still have to > follow that. Otherwise, you could circumvent 'preserve this copyright > notice / preserve authorship information / ...=E2=80=99 requirements by > relicensing it as something very permissive, which seems a loophole to > me. >> For prior cases see modules/srfi/srfi-71.scm as distributed with >> Guile. The file contains a SRFI sample implementation with the same ISC >> license header. It seems to be fine to relicense modules distributed >> with Guile as LGPL-3.0-or-later. > > I am not following, how is this relicensing? > >> In the Guix package definition for Guile only license:lgpl3+ is listed (= and not license:isc). > > Right, I would add license:isc with an appropriate comment to the list > in the Guile package definition, looks like the license information > for that package is incomplete. > > [...] > > More generally, I don't see a need for computing an 'effective > license' (*) of the licenses of the individual files, given the lack > of legal experts here and as 'licenses' accepts a list, not only a > single item. > > (*) things like 'isc or expat + lgplN-or-later -> lgplN-or-later'. > > Greetings, > Maxime. > > [2. OpenPGP public key --- application/pgp-keys; OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725= EE.asc]... > > [[End of PGP Signed Part]]