unofficial mirror of guix-patches@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Bruno Victal <mirai@makinata.eu>
To: Saku Laesvuori <saku@laesvuori.fi>
Cc: 62642@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#62642] [PATCH] services: certbot: Fix nginx crash when certbot is used without domains
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 14:21:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84bb2e1c-db0c-ac08-9275-ffcc0f828b1c@makinata.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230403180659.zhbtbfnn2uhgplgc@X-kone>

On 2023-04-03 19:06, Saku Laesvuori wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> Is there a use-case for certbot without any certificate configurations provided?
> 
> I was writing a service that extends certbot if a configuration option
> for it is set to #t. To me it seems that it is currently impossible to
> view the configuration in the service type definition, so I worked
> around it by extending certbot-service-type with an empty list if the
> option is set to #f.

Right, that's a valid use case.

> 
>> IMO it looks to me that the 'certificates' field shouldn't have a default value
>> configured instead?
> 
> Wouldn't that mean that users who use certbot only via services that
> extend it would have to configure 'certificates' to () manually and have
> their nginx configuration crash if they remove the extending services
> and forget to remove the certbot service?

You're correct, having the default value set is not a problem here.

IMO, certbot should be extending the nginx service only when the 'challenge' field
is #f (ideally this should be made into a “enumerated” type, where the values range from
'http-01, 'dns-01, 'custom (as an escape hatch), ...)

Perhaps you could partition 'certificates' by whether 'challenge' is #f or not and use the
results to craft the nginx extension value instead?


Cheers,
Bruno




  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-04 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-03 13:32 [bug#62642] [PATCH] services: certbot: Fix nginx crash when certbot is used without domains Saku Laesvuori via Guix-patches via
2023-04-03 14:28 ` Bruno Victal
2023-04-03 18:06   ` Saku Laesvuori via Guix-patches via
2023-04-04 13:21     ` Bruno Victal [this message]
2023-04-04 20:43       ` [bug#62642] [PATCH v2] " Saku Laesvuori via Guix-patches via
2023-06-18 21:11         ` bug#62642: [PATCH] " Ludovic Courtès
2023-04-13  9:00       ` [bug#62642] " Saku Laesvuori via Guix-patches via
2023-05-22 11:34         ` Saku Laesvuori via Guix-patches via

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84bb2e1c-db0c-ac08-9275-ffcc0f828b1c@makinata.eu \
    --to=mirai@makinata.eu \
    --cc=62642@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=saku@laesvuori.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).