From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id uIxCBzT3NWEVGgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 13:10:44 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id mESZAjT3NWEIVwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:10:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F75F419 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 13:10:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40970 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNCWQ-0007tD-M0 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:10:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNCUp-000758-GL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:09:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNCUo-00036o-MW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:09:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNCUo-0007uo-Gr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45692] [PATCH v4 3/3] gnu: Add ZFS service type. Resent-From: raid5atemyhomework Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45692 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxime Devos Cc: "45692@debbugs.gnu.org" <45692@debbugs.gnu.org>, zimoun Received: via spool by 45692-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45692.163092651830383 (code B ref 45692); Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 45692) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2021 11:08:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52144 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNCUQ-0007tz-5a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:08:38 -0400 Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.132]:34593) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNCUM-0007tj-Ev for 45692@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 07:08:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:08:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1630926507; bh=PEY7r3S6ortpSMdtQkpSbcbQ6f6kF4aoHsRX8WduhFc=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pvo+aa2DEJQs4jgu1SunK6qrA9RiOhUGX2dfrhLJ5nbioLHl8Xva6HCcG10C48jzX IfZPq6Yu5pH56UtN58XLOd3ogdJ0RwfpZtCrmRUdNHeyTIKo4fU0A3ND/mb/Gas9EY MHS58YH+cp5MzxIR8PUc/xL93qYu2o+kPOBARiOA= Message-ID: <84VZkrMdtpnHj3fTyW5llNzMcTOVnkpIKR7xkrJqC_6hjYVSSQCYchxbgIuLF6cP5L_4v5nDGjdFyP5_qeSt1e26Tv7Ga1r59ey0j-dvgt0=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <2020c2223378c7eb3635defb27e6b4545e048b9f.camel@telenet.be> <86bl56jfdn.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: raid5atemyhomework X-ACL-Warn: , raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches From: raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1630926643; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=PEY7r3S6ortpSMdtQkpSbcbQ6f6kF4aoHsRX8WduhFc=; b=FpbuwJPji0NzX7cnU0vYfLa07/U2LK45rnbEIug7qhY3CFOnjnK7w+eFc3QiztVBu3osr3 ZsxPqpWtMm5WB16Ajydj2RyY+WqG40UnBG1+I7BYAITH8FbrcpPieOC8ef2rbjCKmE9/7M WS+Ik8Ls/RHt4dFhIHvO3uAl2fvv36IxQFRYucjrO4c9zo/0qVyykj0cnKMGYtj70GOLNh MiYU3ym1DuqiHz//oHNvkzx7UQg1yDxkx/4CzBG74g96rcBDe5Es8uTUWU3A7hHq0jVAt+ ag5YYLnxZrl28WbJ9Hgzvi98X2JaciOq0Vkp/7lFW/7l7QKUA2RXG8XKMoUGzQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1630926643; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SeotZpJCeSd/BVGGWZkhsgqU0cgIRleJX0EvamMaVOhk73K0aduvsSFn899zpF11LzqMQ3 TDiWMt3pFZwTfVD0Mf6/HjHF3aAKFXOQFRNqONMa7Jjoyf+XALzyHlSbkKR++WEPFBGXx3 s0/5AFRxctgCCmQ17dViD/ZZWmR70hD4D8ulof9hnomFpPFOBjFjnQ6tm+ypBQSWC8CarV sq1WY23esTyVCVbJvSqWbzDMFCj24gh25hIEddGw8bfdGOo9Bvaxay6au9D3EbZwTt9a4G vakrMNr04qVoKfx8BtqonOWEhE3/JcpXqb+w5w9WmFp0vtV9VUTWRQkONFaLkA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=pvo+aa2D; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.91 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=pvo+aa2D; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 77F75F419 X-Spam-Score: -2.91 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: z5Ay5rG6oNFi Hello Maxime, > > Other said, the distribution of the zfs.ko is an issue, not > > provide a way to build it locally. Well, it does not appear to be a GPL > > violation, IIUC the SFC analysis. > > I neglected that the terms of the GPL that come into play depend on wheth= er > one is only distributing source code () or also binaries, and whether one= is > distributing modified source code. > I don't quite see a GPL violation anymore if we only distribute unmodifie= d > source code. However, what about freedom (1) and (3) (freedom to [...] an= d > change the program in source form and (3) distribute modified versions)? > I was going to write something here about why that would not be (legally) > possible because of the CDDL and GPL, but I forgot why it wouldn't be > possible. Maybe it is actually possible? > () raid5atemyhomework noted that guix does not distribute source code,it = only points to source code locations. I don't quite agree. From my > point of view, on whose server the source code is hosted is merely a > technicality, guix is just =E2=80=98out-sourcing=E2=80=99 the source code= distribution. > Besides, ci.guix.gnu.org keeps a copy of the source code, and > (guix download) will try to download from ci.guix.gnu.org. *shrug* if so, take note that the `zfs` package modifies the build system a= nd even some of the source code in order to adapt it to the slightly differ= ent Guix environment (in particular, Guix does not give an FHS to packages = being built, so we need to point some paths directly to absolute paths). I am not really interested in modifying the patch unless the license issue = is resolved, so I will wait until Guix maintainers can actually agree on wh= ether there is a license violation or not. Thanks raid5atemyhomework