From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aHpxOEZVk1/nGAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:12:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id UApJNEZVk18gXQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:12:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E769400C7 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kW5IL-00056J-CU for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:12:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kW5I2-000564-1X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:12:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kW5I1-0002Do-Ob for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:12:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kW5I1-0001Fv-KI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44130] [PATCH] Add a recursive version of mkdir-p Resent-From: divoplade Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44130 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zimoun Cc: 44130@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44130-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44130.16034910864783 (code B ref 44130); Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:12:01 +0000 Received: (at 44130) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2020 22:11:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kW5HR-0001F5-Ta for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:11:26 -0400 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:2919) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kW5HQ-0001Er-3C for 44130@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:11:24 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 86.202.110.111 Received: from divoplade.home (lfbn-lyo-1-15-111.w86-202.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.202.110.111]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4AF6240002; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <84964ce5ce08deafc937a7a4c2fc6dc9115b437b.camel@divoplade.fr> From: divoplade Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 00:11:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <86sga420pw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <6ff632f5c1e378647cecc7177b7018fb8a0ee6d4.camel@divoplade.fr> <86sga420pw.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: j9FXAjSVlZfM Le vendredi 23 octobre 2020 à 21:36 +0200, zimoun a écrit : > salut, > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 01:29, divoplade wrote: > > > 1. Lobby guile to provide this function out of the box (this will > > take > > time); > > This path seems the one to go. It will take less time than running > Guile on Windows. ;-) > > The only issue is that your code will depend on Guile 3.0.x where > x>4. > > Otherwise, why is it not possible to send a patch to Guile? The discussion continues here, in order to send the desired patch to guile: 44186@debbugs.gnu.org