From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54767) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Jnj-0004Os-LI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:24:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Jne-0003p8-Pk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:24:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Jne-0003p1-GB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Jne-0007L8-9A for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:24:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28616] disable failing bluez test Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:23:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20171011.181058.1825950437807455612.post@thomasdanckaert.be> References: <874lrfew8v.fsf@fastmail.com> <20171004.200454.31853833354551300.post@thomasdanckaert.be> <877ew28yw8.fsf@fastmail.com> <20171011.181058.1825950437807455612.post@thomasdanckaert.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Marius Bakke Message-ID: <7901620A-A50E-4C3F-86C3-1E135522029B@fastmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Thomas Danckaert Cc: 28616@debbugs.gnu.org On 11 October 2017 18:10:58 CEST, Thomas Danckaert wrote: >From: Marius Bakke >Subject: Re: [bug#28616] disable failing bluez test >Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:40:39 +0200 > >> Thomas Danckaert writes: >>=20 >>> From: Marius Bakke >>> Subject: Re: [bug#28616] disable failing bluez test >>> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 23:50:56 +0200 >>> >>>> I think we should apply the patch regardless (on 'core-updates'), >with a >>>> link to the upstream discussion=2E IMO it's more important to be >able to >>>> build from source regardless of hardware, than running this one >unit >>>> test=2E What do you think? >>> >>> I agree=2E >>> >>> I'll push this to core-updates then=2E >>=20 >> On second thought, "bluez" is currently failing on armhf, seemingly >due >> to the original patch: > > >I believe attached patch does the job for master, just touching armhf >and leaving other architectures alone=2E I tested it by replacing >armhf-linux with x86_64-linux, and then it skips the test =2E=2E=2E > >WDYT? Yay! I am unable to test it right now, but if you've verified that this do= esn't change the derivation on other architectures this LGTM=2E Thank you! PS: feel free to merge it to core-updates after pushing and modify it to a= pply on all arches there=2E If you're not comfortable I can do this later= =2E --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail=2E Please excuse my brevity=2E