From: jgart via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org>
To: "Xinglu Chen" <public@yoctocell.xyz>, 47852@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Raghav Gururajan <rg@raghavgururajan.name>,
jackhill@jackhill.us, raghavgururajan@disroot.org,
Oliver Loaiza <olv345@hotmail.com>,
hello@elenq.tech
Subject: [bug#47852] [PATCH] gnu: Add sc-im
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 16:57:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78610039d802cd5f6d61a9f7e36a0df2@dismail.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lf9feeb8.fsf@yoctocell.xyz>
> In the same way that asciinema is a screen recorder for the terminal ;)
>
Yes, it's currently not consistent what's included in the terminals module.
Asciinema should probably go somewhere else.
Maybe we need a terminal-apps module like haskell-apps and rust-apps.
We can put all of these terminal programs in this new module. I think that would make things clearer.
What do you think?
>> Maybe we can do a clean up soon and put all these programs in a new
>> module?
> That would probably be a good idea. The way packages are categorized is
> still a little confusing to me. :)
Let's plan on that. I'd be happy help with clean up.
BTW, I'm hosting a guix packaging meetup in 6 days.
If you'd like to work on any of this together in a group or a new package/upgrade stop by:
https://events.nixnet.services/events/27955ca1-0aee-4ec5-be20-48e6c45fd0f6
all the best,
jgart
April 18, 2021 12:41 PM, "Xinglu Chen" <public@yoctocell.xyz> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 18 2021, jgart wrote:
>
>> I appreciate your review. I attached an updated patch with your
>> suggestions. Thank you for pointing those out.
>
> You are welcome!
>
>> I moved home-page closer to the top so that I can reuse it in the url
>> field.
>
> Good idea.
>
>>> I suggest adding it to (gnu packages terminals) instead of creating a
>>> new file. You will find asciinema and fzf there.
>>
>> I'm not sure if it makes sense to me for sc-im to go into terminals.
>>
>> It seems like terminals has mostly terminal emulators.
>>
>> Like I pointed out in my previous email, why wouldn't calcurse and
>> visidata also go into the terminals module?
>
> I don’t know why those two programs are in their own files, but after
> taking a closer look, I found that some programs are put in different
> modules based on the program’s purpose. For example, bashtop, htop, and
> nnn all go in (gnu packages admin), and neomutt/mutt are put in (gnu
> packages mail). By that logic maybe it would make sense to put sc-im in
> (gnu packages maths) or (gnu packages statistics)?
>
>> sc-im is a spreadsheet program for the terminal in the same way that
>> calcurse is a calendar program for the terminal.
>
> In the same way that asciinema is a screen recorder for the terminal ;)
>
>> Maybe we can do a clean up soon and put all these programs in a new
>> module?
>
> That would probably be a good idea. The way packages are categorized is
> still a little confusing to me. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-18 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-17 21:52 [bug#47852] [PATCH] gnu: Add sc-im jgart via Guix-patches via
2021-04-17 22:22 ` ElenQ Technology
2021-04-17 23:29 ` Jack Hill
2021-04-17 23:54 ` jgart via Guix-patches via
2021-04-18 0:32 ` jgart via Guix-patches via
2021-04-18 9:25 ` Xinglu Chen
2021-04-18 15:39 ` jgart via Guix-patches via
2021-04-18 16:40 ` Xinglu Chen
2021-04-18 16:57 ` jgart via Guix-patches via [this message]
2021-04-19 15:33 ` Xinglu Chen
2021-04-19 16:46 ` jgart via Guix-patches via
2021-04-19 21:48 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2021-04-20 4:57 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-22 19:56 ` jgart via Guix-patches via
2021-04-23 9:22 ` jgart via Guix-patches via
2021-04-23 16:41 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-20 5:00 ` Leo Famulari
2021-11-19 1:22 ` [bug#47852] [PATCH 1/2 v6] " jgart via Guix-patches via
2021-11-19 1:22 ` [bug#47852] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Move visidata to (gnu packages spreadsheet-apps) jgart via Guix-patches via
2021-11-22 21:20 ` [bug#47852] [PATCH 1/2 v6] gnu: Add sc-im Leo Famulari
2021-11-22 23:23 ` jgart via Guix-patches via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78610039d802cd5f6d61a9f7e36a0df2@dismail.de \
--to=guix-patches@gnu.org \
--cc=47852@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=hello@elenq.tech \
--cc=jackhill@jackhill.us \
--cc=jgart@dismail.de \
--cc=olv345@hotmail.com \
--cc=public@yoctocell.xyz \
--cc=raghavgururajan@disroot.org \
--cc=rg@raghavgururajan.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).