From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57566)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hdsFq-0001oa-92
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:17:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hds81-0005mu-Nr
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:09:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34276)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hds7x-0005kw-WD
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:09:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hds7x-0001Bm-QS
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 04:09:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#36297] gnu: weechat: update to 2.5
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36297.B36297.15610181124523@debbugs.gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <77cf0ef4-2734-444e-a76d-373a5dc22ac6@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE4v=pgz5w4=BDNygEec48HqXbMyHY7M5zQR1n_wS-2YObqWhA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE4v=pgz5w4=BDNygEec48HqXbMyHY7M5zQR1n_wS-2YObqWhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:08:21 +0100
From: "Josh Holland" <josh@inv.alid.pw>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>, 36297@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi G=C3=A1bor,

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019, at 8:46 AM, G=C3=A1bor Boskovits wrote:
> Is removing the comment intentional?

Yes, the "sic"[0] was indicating that the typo of "jvascript" was intend=
ed (to match an upstream typo). That's now been fixed, so the comment is=
 no longer necessary.

Thanks,
Josh

[0]: see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic