From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hiLEL-0000DY-Fi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:02:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hiLEK-0007IG-CR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:02:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hiLEI-0007H6-2o for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:02:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hiLEH-0002Jo-LN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:02:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#36213] [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add pulseaudio-dlna. Resent-Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <76eb1a48-171f-4e2c-9d3e-845f6dbcd0ea@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87lfxg5t4y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9f57b4cb-e4e9-4dfa-9308-9263b5edfe23@www.fastmail.com> <3ee05f72-19df-4eb0-89c0-37ddded34d57@www.fastmail.com> <87lfxg5t4y.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 16:01:27 +0000 From: "Alex Griffin" Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36213@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Ludo, On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, at 3:54 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > +(define-public pulseaudio-dlna > > + (let ((commit "4472928dd23f274193f14289f59daec411023ab0") > > + (revision "1")) >=20 > Could you explain why you chose this commit rather than the latest > release? Honestly, I just noticed that Debian was building from git. I assumed th= ey had a good reason, so I didn't even try the latest release from 2016.= > > + (arguments `(#:python ,python-2)) >=20 > Can it run on Python 3? >=20 > Since Python 2 is approaching EOL, we=E2=80=99re trying to avoid addin= g more > Python 2 packages. If we could remove =E2=80=98python2-=E2=80=99 pack= ages from this > patch series, that=E2=80=99d be great; if not, so be it! No, it doesn't run on Python 3. It's actually unmaintained right now, bu= t I'm not aware of any other free software projects that provide the sam= e functionality. --=20 Alex Griffin