From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iiNIl-0001sB-AT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:47:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iiNIk-0000lT-BT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:47:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iiNIk-0000kl-72 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:47:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iiNIk-0005Eg-4g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:47:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38408] [PATCH v4 2/6] gnu: added new procedure, recusive-import-semver Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:46:03 -0800 From: Martin Becze In-Reply-To: <87woaskm08.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5b82d5ab2c9d579d279db055b8f12509587234fa.1576005195.git.mjbecze@riseup.net> <87woaskm08.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <74e229c9340764337bbea3752a4f8c50@riseup.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 38408@debbugs.gnu.org > Since there’s currently a single user, the Crate importer, I would > rather have semver-handling directly in (guix import crate). Sure we > can try to write it in a way that clearly separates semver handling from > Crate-specific bits, but we shouldn’t try to make it too generic at this > point, IMO. > > WDYT? I don't have strong opinion but I'm happy to write it this way!