From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id oAZXEcaOA2ClHQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:11:34 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id oHYJDcaOA2CobgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:11:34 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CAEA9402A2 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0wbM-0008Cy-6o for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:11:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0was-0008Cc-5a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:11:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0war-0000Nj-T4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:11:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0war-0005kt-Oc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45721] Telegram Desktop (v9) Resent-From: Raghav Gururajan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45721 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Prikler , 45721@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 45721-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45721.161084582022074 (code B ref 45721); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:11:01 +0000 Received: (at 45721) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2021 01:10:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44376 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0waB-0005jy-S2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:10:20 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:58437) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l0waA-0005ji-LA for 45721@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:10:19 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 76.68.120.100 Received: from [192.168.5.10] (bras-vprn-toroon474rw-lp130-08-76-68-120-100.dsl.bell.ca [76.68.120.100]) (Authenticated sender: rg@raghavgururajan.name) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97B0CC0004; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 01:10:11 +0000 (UTC) References: <260455952500fcfd067f395a55a7ac78a4f1bd0a.camel@student.tugraz.at> From: Raghav Gururajan Message-ID: <6e44fc3a-2745-801e-620b-c85ee44500e4@raghavgururajan.name> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:10:09 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9CAEA9402A2 X-Spam-Score: -2.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: XuYf3BDiq88a Hi Leo! > Again, you can (define gpl2+ license:gpl2+) at the start of the module, > so that existing definitions can be kept the same, but your packages > adhere to the license: style. Updated in v12, as per discussed in IRC. > Use full commit hashes please. Updated in v12. > Perhaps, but it seems kinda weird, that this package gets special > treatment in how we accept anything else it might pull in. There are existing packages in guix that uses recursive. But your concern is valid. May be we can update git-fetch in guix to have an option for fetching only specific/mentioned sub-modules. > I don't particularly agree with the way this has been solved in v10. > Do we really need to keep around custom forks and old versions? Can we > not instead patch tg_owt? The situation is same as with tg_owt. They made custom changes in the fork. Like unique foo::bar. Regards, RG.