From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fD8gx-0000kk-4u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:18:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fD8gt-0006yf-4O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:18:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fD8gs-0006yX-Tb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:18:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fD8gs-0002VL-GL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:18:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31178] [PATCH] gnu: Add inxi. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:17:16 +0200 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice In-Reply-To: <20180416123830.28716-1-ambrevar@gmail.com> References: <20180416123830.28716-1-ambrevar@gmail.com> Message-ID: <6bfd106694d22b12df90b408482e9798@debbugs.gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt , 31178@debbugs.gnu.org Pierre, Thanks for your work so far! Discussions about inputs (bah, propagation's evil) and who'll write what aside: On 2018-04-16 14:38, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > + ;; TODO: Include additional inputs once their corresponding packages > is no > + ;; longer missing: hddtemp, dig (from dnsutils), perl-xml-dumper. > ipmitool > + ;; and ipmi-sensors. The only canonical ‘dig’ that I know & love comes from the BIND project, as installed by ‘bind:utils’. Does inxi explicitly require this ‘dnsutils’ version? Is it a fork? Patched? Separate implementation? I think I have a ‘hddtemp’ package banging about somewhere. > + ("curl" ,curl) ; only if dig is missing. > [...] > + ;; ("wget" ,wget) ; only if dig and curl are > missing. Curl's closure is bigger than that of wget (~210 MiB vs. ~127 MiB), but it's probably smaller than wget+bind. Would curl alone cover all uses of wget+bind in the script? (‘I can't be bothered to dig through it’ is an acceptable answer.) Kind regards, T G-R Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.