>> Do you think they could be fixed?

Fixed in the attached patch.

 > Even though this description is a copy of the SRFI abstract, it seems a
 > bit vague. I would change "describes" to "implements" or "provides". The
 > affirmation "JSON bigger than memory" could also be expanded I think.

I tried to spruce it up a bit. Thanks for the feedback!

On 8/31/20 3:14 AM, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> 
> Hey,
> 
>>> * gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm (guile-srfi-180): New variable.
> 
> I'm getting a whole bunch of warnings when building srfi/180/body.scm,
> such as:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> srfi/180/body.scm:237:11: warning: possibly unbound variable `textual-port?'
> srfi/180/body.scm:198:4: warning: possibly unbound variable `eof-object'
> srfi/180/body.scm:195:2: warning: possibly unbound variable `assume'
> srfi/180/body.scm:191:23: warning: possibly unbound variable `make-json-error'
> srfi/180/body.scm:190:29: warning: possibly unbound variable `make-json-error'
> srfi/180/body.scm:186:16: warning: possibly unbound variable `valid-number?'
> srfi/180/body.scm:167:29: warning: possibly unbound variable `make-json-error'
> srfi/180/body.scm:146:59: warning: possibly unbound variable `bitwise-ior'
> srfi/180/body.scm:111:15: warning: possibly unbound variable `make-json-error'
> srfi/180/body.scm:106:15: warning: possibly unbound variable `make-json-error'
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> Do you think they could be fixed?
> 
>>> +       "This library describes a JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) parser and printer.
>>> +It supports JSON that may be bigger than memory.")
> 
> Even though this description is a copy of the SRFI abstract, it seems a
> bit vague. I would change "describes" to "implements" or "provides". The
> affirmation "JSON bigger than memory" could also be expanded I think.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mathieu
>