From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id oMmWAytaYWCPIAEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:40:11 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id GCpJOCpaYWDDCgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 04:40:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E33198FF for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 06:40:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56564 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQjhA-0000NE-RS for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:40:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQjh5-0000Lm-M2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:40:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQjh4-0002QE-8C for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:40:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQjh4-0007sk-1t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45692] [PATCH v3 0/3] New patch series for Even Better ZFS Support on Guix Resent-From: raid5atemyhomework Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 04:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45692 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o?= Le Bouter Cc: "45692@debbugs.gnu.org" <45692@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 45692-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45692.161699277730257 (code B ref 45692); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 04:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 45692) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2021 04:39:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47470 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQjgf-0007rx-HN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:39:37 -0400 Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.137]:25068) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQjgd-0007rj-L4 for 45692@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 00:39:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 04:39:26 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1616992768; bh=hrTMIorCjSrx0Al3eyoZR9XyV1MlB6lt7axkIWHL2AY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n0dAtFtZNDHdzQStpKvhPIle77tHD6hdcaU3SG2EDiSc7T54zXbYb0a47IEJqOhMz Y3CmlNlzVx/3ifoPPb3mnZHpVg7jbN1KN9p8KebDLbH1a798M4567eMyvWJS8BBCrS hRAAgZlgX1srll1fqOxOKBWxSsX6YynrNvHBl6F8= Message-ID: <6_CTNY0LKnK4gdEM41_839GBi_6dql-yEVzGPVMQDFvi6JNkQF1BoxQu9_6gRx6bTNqk6rSpUhxDtDWveZOBnxYdMMW9h87WPP8uWZPteZk=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: raid5atemyhomework X-ACL-Warn: , raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches From: raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1616992810; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=hrTMIorCjSrx0Al3eyoZR9XyV1MlB6lt7axkIWHL2AY=; b=tUoJaIMOHYi8yApCFSzno8i4aWJ3eQQR3KF542RAyp591RV3Yh9+DkyshfwAf2pePHGtzk JFGNPrVunf8x65l+GoLCLjqcmQRO9jH1b5CMUoisT/VMfbHO/z8md+3wr58Coa4MONWqAA IJAD2g6OoZURx/YS4RbhjjpgRJKhlHklOdfy1kTVOc8AG4+NuEt/WrELmoMwGOe8sMqHuz yvGe+iBTPiBm6PN1GVHcqFmH1Ex6JI5UFgBoeIk3yPfHs6zHInoTXnmn68YZXhAjPw9+Ko foR7KGHmkWW9rKtTr+Qi51Mg8MTu5dT9rmthlbZVA1kLPZ9xtgkAxJvUUbYtrQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1616992810; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bFbanE5ol4dqI6Uqw0q6EGHKbWZOpkzJO5aECy503zxA2T0k/hOFgDu/DyNvPcBmz2OZkW bxFERbeFQ9qYWz13dj6Q84KAl+yXAVvdEPw7GKXRsECz9DG+YIpKShao2CpQal8TkIEZbb ZzSNwN35WQPi4sONkMVacRwHcjIdKwi7wi1D/Fjn1FAk0kw7+j0kpCRRzG2VvSWHewvCex xMchSTn4erFZ/hA1tA0FVwKjzdk8wkKFz5vKtuCR26Ot/PW4huNBNCOVkGCIOIUBfV2hFf LHrTOFj/25h3vGOTS5fWwfHAg6JmsmkUrZ7yN+m0/b97zP9TO/dsJ/9xlpVF5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=n0dAtFtZ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.92 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=n0dAtFtZ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 55E33198FF X-Spam-Score: -2.92 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: dUjS1k0Vb6NP > On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 14:33 +0000, raid5atemyhomework via Guix-patches > via wrote: > > > Personally I'm not particularly motivated to push this anymore. I > > have a frankenstein's `configuration.scm` that gets me the bits of > > ZFS functionality that I absolutely need, with the rest something I'm > > just living without, and while it would be nice to have some out- > > of-the-box support for ZFS (or at least make it easy to get a box to > > get support for ZFS out of), I personally don't need it at this > > point. > > I understand your frustration but also understand that the people who > are able to review your patches can't make themselves available in the > way you desire, there's lots of pending patches to GNU Guix and as much > as ZFS support is valuable, there's also lots of other things that are > valuable and are in the backlog. > > > Patch 1/3 corresponds to the original Patch 1/4. Patch 2/3 has no > > corresponding patch in the original patch set, but is the same patch > > as https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47134 which nobody is looking at, as > > usual. Patch 3/3 corresponds to the original Patch 4/4. > > Please do not blame or shame us for not looking at patches, it's not > very nice, we do our best, at all times. We are overworked and the > people who are knowledgeable about GNU Guix and Scheme particularily > so. I don't feel like I am knowledgeable about Scheme and GNU Guix > enough to review your patches, sorry for that. Okay. Thanks raid5atemyhomework