Hi Maxim, On 2023-10-02 20:12, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Could you offer some of your perspective as to why you preferred that > approach compared to generating multiple, tailored for use, serializers, > possibly created via a procedure? Was there a problem with doing so, or > what is less readable, etc.? Right, as already pointed out by Liliana in [1]. As for the perspective I'm afraid the reason is a rather unexciting one: I completely overlooked that it was another¹ approach that could have been done instead! (and a much simpler one at that) I'm dropping this one as well since it's clear now that there's a cleaner approach for passing these kinds of additional data. [1]: Message-ID: <6445e508cbc8a9f92d3a54263193936d168cd7cf.camel@gmail.com> Link: ¹PS: Example attached for any future readers interested in the topic. -- Furthermore, I consider that nonfree software must be eradicated. Cheers, Bruno.