From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39906)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1drSRJ-0001dq-NN
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:24:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1drSRG-0002Ve-Jt
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:24:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53469)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1drSRG-0002VW-G9
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:24:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1drSRG-0000h3-9m
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 13:24:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#28281] [PATCH] gnu: Add os-prober.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28281.B28281.15051505962613@debbugs.gnu.org>
Message-Id: <5955a67b.AEAAP2Xyu20AAAAAAAAAAAPmNSgAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZtsaB@mailjet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 22:53:03 +0530
In-reply-to: <87shftelsx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170909171635.7968-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
	<e7d9c9ca.AEQAP00oGCwAAAAAAAAAAAOzWv8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZtCPY@mailjet.com>
	<874lsa900c.fsf@gnu.org>
	<403302d1.ADkAAC_e-_IAAAAAAAAAAAOzWv8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZtWIT@mailjet.com>
	<87k2165lry.fsf@gnu.org>
	<5dc91a20.AEAAPzHdNuYAAAAAAAAAAAOzWv8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZtcxv@mailjet.com>
	<87shftelsx.fsf@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 28281@debbugs.gnu.org


>>> Would (copy-recursively "/some/directory" destination) work for you?
>>
>> No, it wouldn't. That would recreate /some/directory at the
>> destination. I only want the files inside /some/directory to be copied,
>> not /some/directory itself.
>
> Ah sorry.  Then yeah, either ‘scandir’ or ‘find-files’, whichever you
> find is the least cumbersome.
>
> Feel free to push something along these lines!

Not sure I follow you. Should I

1. push the patch I sent most recently

OR

2. or add a #:recursive? argument to `find-files', and push a patch
which uses this new `find-files'?

IMO, approach 2 is a better idea, though it could be that we are adding
too many keyword arguments to `find-files'.

WDYT?