From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czVAr-0003CK-K1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:24:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czVAo-00036M-HF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:24:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czVAo-000361-7n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czVAn-0000K1-WF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:24:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26502: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Message-Id: <58c349c7.AEMAJOUepUQAAAAAAAAAAAO1L9sAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY8o9J@mailjet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Arun Isaac Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 02:53:08 +0530 In-reply-to: <874lxpobkk.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <874lxpobkk.fsf@fastmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 26502-done@debbugs.gnu.org Pushed! Marius Bakke writes: > LGTM. Trivial changes like these are generally OK to push without going > through this list as outlined in HACKING. > > Just be mindful about the amount of rebuilds it will cause. If `guix > refresh -l ` prints more than ~300 dependents, it should go > through the "staging" or "core-updates" branch. See this thread for the > branching strategy: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html Sure, will keep that in mind! =