[bug#41360] [PATCH v5] finalize java-openjfx packages

[Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4071 bytes --]

Hi!

I think your patches are a bit difficult to review. I'll have a proper look this evening, but for now two things I noticed:

You declare configure flags as a list of flags, but at some point you have:

"-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=\""
…
"\""

In the list. I think it's incorrect because they would be passed as separate arguments (though it might work when parsed by the program). I think you should zake it a single argument with string-append.

Also, we should now use the new style inputs for packages when possible:

(list foo bar) instead of `(("foo" ,foo) ("bar" ,bar))

Thanks!

On June 19, 2022 9:26:32 PM GMT+02:00, Ioannis Kappas <ioannis.kappas@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>could you please consider reviewing patches to finalize the building
>of the java-openjfx packages in scope of this discussion, as part of
>an attempt to complete Alexey's awesome work.
>
>The thread had stopped receiving updates for some time now. I assume
>priorities were shifted elsewhere.
>
>I recently got interested testing an openjfx application on Java 1.8,
>only to realise that the current packages are incomplete. I came
>across this thread, and thought to give the patches a try, and fix
>where possible.
>
>I believe I have finalised all openjfx packages in scope to build,
>pass all tests and seamlessly link to their native libraries at
>runtime.
>
>My test application now works, I can use the graphics, controls and
>web openjfx packages by merely specifying their share/java jar
>packages on the classpath.
>
>This email has three incremental patches. I've named the as [PATCH v5]
>to denote this is a continuation from the last patches.
>
>0001: Alexey's work brought forward to a recent guix revision.
>
>0002: Small changes to updated the above to build with the current
>guix spec/packages.
>
>0003: My update to finalize the openjfx packages, normalize inputs,
>run all tests where they exist and fix the load path of native
>libraries at runtime.
>
>I've put the author of 0001 down to Alexey since this is his works. I
>compiled this patch by hand from the thread, I hope I haven't missed
>anything.
>
>The individual packages produce a jar output, and some of them also
>build native shared libraries. The individual jar packages try to load
>their native libraries just by name, and this will fail if the native
>libs are not on the library path.
>
>I've taken the decision to load these libraries by their full
>gnu/store path instead of their names. I have also applied the same to
>an external package, java-swt, since it has a shared library that has
>to be located at runtime. Although there are a few native libraries
>built by the java-openjfx-graphics package I left it as is, because it
>has a sophisticated native library loader that locates shared
>libraries relative to the jar location.
>
>The changes in 0003 are as follows:
>
>* java-openjfx-graphics
>  1. Normalize inputs, only build against gtk-2.0.
>  2. Output native libs to openjfx standard share/amd64 dir.
>  3. Do not build libjpeg from source, but rather use corresponding
>     package.
>  4. Run all tests.
>* java-openjfx-controls
>  1. Run all tests.
>  2. Fix java-openjfx-graphics name typo.
>* java-openjfx-media
>  1. Build against gstreamer.
>  2. Compile native library and modify loader to load it directly from
>     the store path.
>* java-openjfx-web
>  1. Include version.
>  2. Modify loader to load native web kit lib directly from the store.
>  3. Fix a failing test, by applying new
>     java-openjfx-build-web-js-test.patch as picked up from a later
>     openjfx revision source code revision, to fix a failing test.
>  4. Run all tests.
>* java-swt
>  1. Modify loader to load native library directly from the gnu/store
>     path if it can't be found otherwise. This is required for
>     seamlessly loading java-swt as an input.
>
>This is my first guix package update, so is likely to require more
>work based on your feedback, which is most welcome.
>
>Thanks

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4444 bytes --]