From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOJ03-0006Cg-8b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:41:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOJ02-0007ce-B3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:41:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOJ02-0007cU-8a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:41:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jOJ02-0000l0-7T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:41:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40601] [bug#39329] [PATCH v4 0/2] Start guix-daemon on SysV. Resent-Message-ID: References: <57afed60-5bca-8776-102f-6126396d481c@gmail.com> <20200413200829.7ceb3c7e@scratchpost.org> <20200413182145.GA24906@jasmine.lan> From: Vincent Legoll Message-ID: <4d13d72e-16ab-a25d-f7a9-263d35cca1a9@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:40:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200413182145.GA24906@jasmine.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari , Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 40601@debbugs.gnu.org, 39329@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, I now have tested the patch series in #40601 also on latest devuan-sysvinit x86_64. On 13/04/2020 20:21, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 08:08:29PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: >> I don't know whether it actually works. >> >> I don't feel great just closing this because of that. > Okay, feel free to reopen if you want [0] > >> I mean SysV is kinda outdated, so I wouldn't even know how to test it myself. >> Would Devuan work? >> Or Redhat 6/CentOS 6? > I'm sure we will get some bug reports if it doesn't work for them. Here's the first one: ;-) the sysvinit init.d script relies on "daemonize" which is not installed by default on devuan. Would fixing it by checking a second round of REQUIRED_BY_INIT after checking the init type be the right way ? Or should I report an issue about that ? But if daemonize is installed, the sysvinit support works as expected, and I can run guix commands as for the other tests I did. Thanks -- Vincent Legoll