From: Philip McGrath <philip@philipmcgrath.com>
To: Skyler Ferris <skyvine@protonmail.com>, 70065@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix@gmail.com>,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>,
Andrew Tropin <andrew@trop.in>
Subject: [bug#70065] [PATCH 4/6] gnu: chez-scheme: Update to 10.0.0.
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 16:17:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4cef86be-421e-4010-939b-5640764fcf3e@philipmcgrath.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa26e895-4326-44ba-b15d-4609370d4bc3@protonmail.com>
Hi Skyler,
On 3/31/24 11:28, Skyler Ferris wrote:
> Hi again! I stepped away from my desk to do something else and as often
> happens the answer came to me.
Thanks for this analysis!
>
> The loko.scm file was not recompiled so it searched chez.scm for a
> variable named chez-scheme-for-system, which is now a syntax
> transformer. But compiled files have already completed the expansion
> phase, so this means that a syntax transformer is invalid. This will not
> cause a problem for `guix pull` because guix rebuilds itself from
> scratch when it gets updated.
>
On 3/31/24 10:35, Skyler Ferris wrote:
> I haven't worked with define-deprecated before. It's a macro, and I know
> that the guile compiler misses recompiling macro dependencies sometimes,
> so maybe it was a problem on my end with having mismatching build
> artifacts.
Very interesting! I hadn't realized that problem with dependency
tracking existed: it might explain some issues I've struggled to
reproduce in the past. It's also given me several surprises about
Guile's implementation of phases: for one thing, apparently
(define-syntax x 42) expands to (define x (make-syntax-transformer 'x
'macro 42)). I wouldn't have expected a macro to create a value that
would exist at runtime.
Philip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-31 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-29 5:15 [bug#70065] [PATCH 0/6] gnu: Update to Racket 8.12, Chez Scheme 10, and Zuo 1.9 Philip McGrath
2024-03-29 5:18 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH 1/6] gnu: zuo: Update to 1.9 Philip McGrath
2024-03-30 14:31 ` Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
2024-03-29 5:18 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH 2/6] gnu: racket: Update to 8.12 Philip McGrath
2024-03-30 14:35 ` Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
2024-03-30 22:10 ` Philip McGrath
2024-03-29 5:18 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH 3/6] gnu: chez-scheme: Reorganize package definitions Philip McGrath
2024-03-30 14:35 ` Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
2024-03-29 5:18 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH 4/6] gnu: chez-scheme: Update to 10.0.0 Philip McGrath
2024-03-30 7:56 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-03-30 14:39 ` Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
2024-03-30 22:49 ` Philip McGrath
2024-03-31 14:35 ` Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
2024-03-31 15:28 ` Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
2024-03-31 20:17 ` Philip McGrath [this message]
2024-04-02 14:55 ` Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
2024-04-01 6:51 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 0/8] Update to Racket 8.12, Chez Scheme 10, and Zuo 1.9 Philip McGrath
2024-04-01 6:51 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 1/8] gnu: zuo: Update to 1.9 Philip McGrath
2024-04-01 6:51 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 2/8] gnu: racket: Update to 8.12 Philip McGrath
2024-04-09 8:46 ` Efraim Flashner
2024-04-11 10:44 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-04-11 12:34 ` Efraim Flashner
2024-04-01 6:51 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 3/8] gnu: chez-scheme: Reorganize package definitions Philip McGrath
2024-04-01 15:40 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-04-02 3:59 ` Philip McGrath
2024-04-01 6:51 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 4/8] gnu: chez-scheme: Update to 10.0.0 Philip McGrath
2024-04-01 6:51 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 5/8] gnu: Deprecate chez-scheme-for-system.in favor of chez-scheme Philip McGrath
2024-04-01 6:51 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 6/8] gnu: Fix uses of deprecated chez-scheme-for-system Philip McGrath
2024-04-01 15:41 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-04-01 6:51 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 7/8] gnu: chez-scheme: Update and simplify machine-type handling Philip McGrath
2024-04-01 15:45 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-04-02 3:59 ` Philip McGrath
2024-04-01 6:51 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH v2 8/8] gnu: chez-scheme: Bootstrap from source Philip McGrath
2024-04-11 10:55 ` bug#70065: [PATCH v2 0/8] Update to Racket 8.12, Chez Scheme 10, and Zuo 1.9 Ludovic Courtès
2024-03-29 5:18 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH 5/6] gnu: chez-scheme: Update and simplify machine-type handling Philip McGrath
2024-03-30 14:40 ` Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
2024-03-29 5:18 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH 6/6] gnu: chez-scheme: Bootstrap from source Philip McGrath
2024-03-30 14:41 ` Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
2024-03-30 14:28 ` [bug#70065] [PATCH 0/6] gnu: Update to Racket 8.12, Chez Scheme 10, and Zuo 1.9 Skyler Ferris via Guix-patches via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4cef86be-421e-4010-939b-5640764fcf3e@philipmcgrath.com \
--to=philip@philipmcgrath.com \
--cc=70065@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=andrew@trop.in \
--cc=cox.katherine.e+guix@gmail.com \
--cc=liliana.prikler@gmail.com \
--cc=skyvine@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).