From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33533) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMPZ8-0006fk-Pj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:36:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMPZ5-0000XD-M9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:36:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39619) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMPZ5-0000Wu-H2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:36:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eMPZ4-0004kk-3A for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:36:03 -0500 Subject: [bug#29542] rng-tools: New upstream location, new releases Resent-Message-ID: From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice References: <20171203003126.GA353@jasmine.lan> Message-ID: <47e7f6ba-930d-9395-0f77-e0d2052eae89@tobias.gr> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 03:38:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="90E46QGnfQN5l5W9g6wWfj9oGdA30kHxB" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: leo@famulari.name, 29542@debbugs.gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --90E46QGnfQN5l5W9g6wWfj9oGdA30kHxB Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="6tWHmVoVqxgCQ0fXLgppQChAtbxgtGVX0"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: leo@famulari.name, 29542@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <47e7f6ba-930d-9395-0f77-e0d2052eae89@tobias.gr> Subject: Re: [bug#29542] rng-tools: New upstream location, new releases References: <20171203003126.GA353@jasmine.lan> In-Reply-To: --6tWHmVoVqxgCQ0fXLgppQChAtbxgtGVX0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote on 03/12/17 at 20:49: > Hm. Looks legit, no? By the way, I take this back. I could be swayed either way. Kind regards, T G-R --6tWHmVoVqxgCQ0fXLgppQChAtbxgtGVX0-- --90E46QGnfQN5l5W9g6wWfj9oGdA30kHxB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCWidYIA0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15yugBALH5NeocKKHcEZQdkA+tkOy9BbPzQoDgp1pOThrb iBqPAQDdo6ms9X0+0DYiLvZwz0IiQzTnbXg0NJ99CKlyYUIbAA== =WL+7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --90E46QGnfQN5l5W9g6wWfj9oGdA30kHxB--