From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id nmZsEHG0FWB+agAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:33:05 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 2LK+C3G0FWDcRAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:33:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB5D940430 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50524 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5vzT-0001Kj-9p for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:33:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5vxX-0001KF-SW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:31:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5vxX-0002Eq-BN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:31:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5vxW-0003UI-DP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45721] Telegram Desktop (v25) Resent-From: Raghav Gururajan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45721 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Prikler Received: via spool by 45721-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45721.161203503611905 (code B ref 45721); Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:31:02 +0000 Received: (at 45721) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2021 19:30:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55838 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5vx5-00035a-Mn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:30:36 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:54355) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5vx2-0002wr-7H for 45721@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:30:34 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 76.68.120.100 Received: from [192.168.5.10] (bras-vprn-toroon474rw-lp130-08-76-68-120-100.dsl.bell.ca [76.68.120.100]) (Authenticated sender: rg@raghavgururajan.name) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A362660003; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:30:24 +0000 (UTC) References: <4d40dc9c-1e76-7831-d648-7e472252de13@raghavgururajan.name> <2c5cc194c98b7a7c11afc73e7b6f995c817e5e9d.camel@student.tugraz.at> From: Raghav Gururajan Message-ID: <4322294b-edf7-9c70-fa16-26f0d9723450@raghavgururajan.name> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:30:22 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2c5cc194c98b7a7c11afc73e7b6f995c817e5e9d.camel@student.tugraz.at> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FGaBlTK9vzdSEDu8AELUKzlSyU1JyYJ5b" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45721@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.35 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8BB5D940430 X-Spam-Score: -4.35 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Lp1NscByRQVU This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --FGaBlTK9vzdSEDu8AELUKzlSyU1JyYJ5b Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TXMR9hzUMny7KTQL6xEE60Kft6OyfoBTp"; protected-headers="v1" From: Raghav Gururajan To: Leo Prikler Cc: 45721@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <4322294b-edf7-9c70-fa16-26f0d9723450@raghavgururajan.name> Subject: Re: Telegram Desktop (v25) References: <4d40dc9c-1e76-7831-d648-7e472252de13@raghavgururajan.name> <2c5cc194c98b7a7c11afc73e7b6f995c817e5e9d.camel@student.tugraz.at> In-Reply-To: <2c5cc194c98b7a7c11afc73e7b6f995c817e5e9d.camel@student.tugraz.at> --TXMR9hzUMny7KTQL6xEE60Kft6OyfoBTp Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------5FE031FFE30E6BE5DBE3D274" Content-Language: en-US This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------5FE031FFE30E6BE5DBE3D274 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Leo! >>>> + (let ((commit "cbd43984ebdf783e94c8303c41385bf82aa36d5b") >>>> + (revision "12")) >>>> + (hidden-package >>>> + (package >>>> + (inherit rlottie) >>>> + (version >>>> + (git-version "0.2" revision commit)) >>> According to Github, Telegram's rlottie is 19 commits ahead and 193 >>> commits behind Samsung's rlottie, whereas Samsung has had 34 >>> commits to >>> master since the release of 0.2. In other words, this should still >>> be >>> 0.1, and I'm not too sure about revision 12. >> >> The desktop-app/rlottie forked samsung/rlottie at a commit >> corresponding >> to v0.2. After forking, desktop-app/rlottie made 19 commits. The >> 12th >> commit is what the package is what this package is building from. >> Hence >> the revision number 12. > That timeline makes little sense. The v0.2 release was on August 19th > 2020, but the two libraries diverge on August 7th -- again according to= > Github. The files also indicate 0.1. >=20 >>>> + (name "telegram-desktop") >>>> + (version "2.5.8") >>> Any news w.r.t. tdesktop#10182 in this build? >> >> Nope! :-( >> >> But build fails w.r.t updated version of tg_owt. I'll have to send >> v26. > I don't think building static libraries is very guixy. If 2.5.8 is no > significant improvement over 2.5.1 in that regard, let's stay with the > latter while we can still build shared libraries. Agreed. I have sent v27. Regards, RG. --------------5FE031FFE30E6BE5DBE3D274 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="OpenPGP_0x5F5816647F8BE551.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_0x5F5816647F8BE551.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- xjMEX2ZCJBYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAdiUK33kml2dYjrWidlr4/v0pmjpUv7hOsBN/oSl5wx7NL= 1Jh Z2hhdiBHdXJ1cmFqYW4gKFJHKSA8cmdAcmFnaGF2Z3VydXJhamFuLm5hbWU+wpMEExYIADsCG= wMF CwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AWIQTNLV6qqYzLN9qR1rBfWBZkf4vlUQUCX28v0AIZA= QAK CRBfWBZkf4vlUQf2AQD63gsdJzk0w6Gy0AzpJtMa63mbVRAh4xfnxsRNu6SbGQD/UDytGjwnQ= 4nK YsGdoCcA7LM64EkknDvI3ZmlqG7Xuw/NPVJhZ2hhdiBHdXJ1cmFqYW4gKEVkdWNhdGlvbikgP= GVk dWNhdGlvbkByYWdoYXZndXJ1cmFqYW4ubmFtZT7CkAQTFggAOBYhBM0tXqqpjMs32pHWsF9YF= mR/ i+VRBQJgE0xGAhsDBQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEF9YFmR/i+VRQcQBALNRe= 1V/ 5DKN8ZxyVQlzt4TdGUyNom7xJ6r23ANtcygxAQDBjw6NLXV3aYGDMVVmQPbdAnFiB/x1rpJsA= wB/ 1BSBDc05UmFnaGF2IEd1cnVyYWphbiAoRmluYW5jZSkgPGZpbmFuY2VAcmFnaGF2Z3VydXJha= mFu Lm5hbWU+wpAEExYIADgWIQTNLV6qqYzLN9qR1rBfWBZkf4vlUQUCYBNMbwIbAwULCQgHAgYVC= gkI CwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBfWBZkf4vlUWnLAP914hb0IzSCiaj+XrcEBaIt/Q+KjRn2fj5A7= V6Z ucJJqwEA64eks7xjLBS3mpTpaGwdDtluJcR7G8XZJJdbdK2YyQ/NN1JhZ2hhdiBHdXJ1cmFqY= W4g KEhlYWx0aCkgPGhlYWx0aEByYWdoYXZndXJ1cmFqYW4ubmFtZT7CkAQTFggAOBYhBM0tXqqpj= Ms3 2pHWsF9YFmR/i+VRBQJgE0yhAhsDBQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEF9YFmR/i= +VR xdcA/3YxFzlKKHrTguDxE1tBWD31BUYlXWl351j6MB/U+tWdAPwJB8QD8janaddv3U5ZGzswf= hQv GGzx6SLcX0E253uNC80/UmFnaGF2IEd1cnVyYWphbiAoT2NjdXBhdGlvbikgPG9jY3VwYXRpb= 25A cmFnaGF2Z3VydXJhamFuLm5hbWU+wpAEExYIADgWIQTNLV6qqYzLN9qR1rBfWBZkf4vlUQUCY= BNM ugIbAwULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBfWBZkf4vlUSrlAP0VJw8frvWHAGd6l= Zdy x1v+relUGB4DToqDgIMBQyG58gD+NU5t4h0IY6YaiQ+FPyJzdV62k15d9IDvTMYPvcWIpQPNP= 1Jh Z2hhdiBHdXJ1cmFqYW4gKFJlY3JlYXRpb24pIDxyZWNyZWF0aW9uQHJhZ2hhdmd1cnVyYWphb= i5u YW1lPsKQBBMWCAA4FiEEzS1eqqmMyzfakdawX1gWZH+L5VEFAmATTNkCGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJC= AsC BBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQX1gWZH+L5VHhbQD/b6jXWdQfxi+xzrs1+A0lvnihfUgQ0H/r5U2bO= w9d FIkA/0nCh0VJKX+YrySJhWugL7e8ItqwKADh0v05vO6qtlkAzTdSYWdoYXYgR3VydXJhamFuI= ChT b2NpYWwpIDxzb2NpYWxAcmFnaGF2Z3VydXJhamFuLm5hbWU+wpAEExYIADgWIQTNLV6qqYzLN= 9qR 1rBfWBZkf4vlUQUCYBNM8AIbAwULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBfWBZkf4vlU= dtv AQCKMxBdxwMUJdyigGWqrTuJUaLVL2dgvqGa0k39nsQA8gD+PH3LsQAaJ98xREKxYXMAszNnJ= RJR xYa9trfixyQbrw7NNVJhZ2hhdiBHdXJ1cmFqYW4gKFRyYWRlKSA8dHJhZGVAcmFnaGF2Z3Vyd= XJh amFuLm5hbWU+wpAEExYIADgWIQTNLV6qqYzLN9qR1rBfWBZkf4vlUQUCYBNNHQIbAwULCQgHA= gYV CgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRBfWBZkf4vlUQ+9AP0S/6S5PLshS/vz7ezRO2HokruaRiDhg= w0t yRM3LAefSQEA7rEBw9sSUsDgRILGKUi1ZzQq5AJ0F77KOXyurVqnywXOOARfZkIkEgorBgEEA= ZdV AQUBAQdAZgiqc2NhH/myrCCan9x7gKI6QBPZ/1b+Bz/f3n95ozkDAQgHwngEGBYIACAWIQTNL= V6q qYzLN9qR1rBfWBZkf4vlUQUCX2ZCJAIbDAAKCRBfWBZkf4vlUV/OAQD+tMNgmddPSchLpaDPp= sdD hpvra2uTonNUmnfbTvPgpQD/dG72NCT8hBUVqtzxwQmBrXY/nPEUxctYuvu3unUmzQU=3D =3DMROf -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------5FE031FFE30E6BE5DBE3D274-- --TXMR9hzUMny7KTQL6xEE60Kft6OyfoBTp-- --FGaBlTK9vzdSEDu8AELUKzlSyU1JyYJ5b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQTNLV6qqYzLN9qR1rBfWBZkf4vlUQUCYBWzzgUDAAAAAAAKCRBfWBZkf4vlUYGM AQDNPAS6bX/c9pVQ0xKUHvkpAFLXy+azLra9bMKWQesmzQEAk9gIUIy4LfEJZlAdt5826dRYwmcF qIddWe3CUMc1fQ0= =g1EV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FGaBlTK9vzdSEDu8AELUKzlSyU1JyYJ5b--