unofficial mirror of guix-patches@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
To: Philip McGrath <philip@philipmcgrath.com>,
	Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>,
	57683@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#57683] [PATCH] gnu: zuo: Use mirrored repository.
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 15:53:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42f7a392-4716-eba7-d237-0241b3f8fada@telenet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9beb36a-797d-f6c2-587c-09fd0c862a51@philipmcgrath.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1386 bytes --]

 > https://docs.racket-lang.org/zuo/

The documentation sounds better as a home page to me than a link to the 
source code.

On 19-09-2022 04:06, Philip McGrath wrote:
> When I hear the word "unbundle", I think of configuring Racket and Chez 
> Scheme to use our shared Zlib and removing their vendored copies. I 
> don't see how the concept applies usefully to the scenario of multiple 
> pieces of software, some of which are useful independently, being 
> developed upstream in the same source tree. Like, what would it mean to 
> "unbundle" gfortran from gcc?

In case of gcc, I think updating the components separately doesn't make 
much sense (from what I hear, it's the same situation for Racket and 
Zuo, where 'Zuo' is just a component of Racket, not something 
independent that's 'merely' a dependency of Racket).

However, for gcc, _building_ the components in separately does IMHO -- 
many users don't need GCC's Go or Fortran compiler, so they are separate 
packages.  However, IIUC, currently when building gccgo and gfortran it 
also rebuilds the internal dependencies like libiberty and libgcc and 
such, which is inefficient, so I think it would be nice to eventually 
split the gcc package in its individual component (but sharing a single 
origin!).

(I don't know if the second paragraph applies to Racket and Zuo.)

Greetings,
Maxime.

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 929 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 236 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-19 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-08 17:27 [bug#57683] [PATCH] gnu: zuo: Use mirrored repository Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-09-09 12:42 ` Maxime Devos
2022-09-09 12:55   ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-09-19  2:06     ` Philip McGrath
2022-09-19 13:53       ` Maxime Devos [this message]
2022-09-19 18:33         ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-09-19 18:40           ` Maxime Devos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42f7a392-4716-eba7-d237-0241b3f8fada@telenet.be \
    --to=maximedevos@telenet.be \
    --cc=57683@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=liliana.prikler@gmail.com \
    --cc=philip@philipmcgrath.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).