From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47011)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hLmx8-0000SX-TN
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 06:59:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hLmx4-0002Xu-Lx
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 06:59:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58209)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1hLmx4-0002Xn-JM
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 06:59:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hLmx4-0005JZ-HU
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 06:59:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#35518] gnu: guile-pfds bugfix
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35518.B35518.155670829020371@debbugs.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 12:58:03 +0200
From: amirouche@hyper.dev
In-Reply-To: <87imuuvgpd.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <141212fdb5356cbf7ad955a70bc26379@hyper.dev>
	<87imuuvgpd.fsf@elephly.net>
Message-ID: <3e5e53e5a9abd81fb7f58a63d890b065@hyper.dev>
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: 35518@debbugs.gnu.org

On 2019-05-01 08:20, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi amirouche,
> 
>> I am not sure how to handle this case.
> 
> Is this fix available upstream?

It is not available upstream. The maintainer is unresponsive for several 
months (years?).

> Has this been reported upstream?

Yes at https://github.com/ijp/pfds/pull/6

> In either case there should be a note about the upstream status of this
> change.

I think pfds would need a new maintainer.

> I’d prefer not to add a patch file here but to add a build phase after
> unpack that uses substitute* to patch the file.

Ok I will do that.