From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52931)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j2Bl1-00030i-7h
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:30:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j2Bkw-0001OM-Gy
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:30:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53387)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j2Bkw-0001Nu-DL
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:30:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j2Bkw-0007Mw-8Q
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:30:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#39587] [PATCH] gnu: Add haproxy.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39587.B39587.158158978128279@debbugs.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:29:34 +0000
From: Brice Waegeneire <brice@waegenei.re>
In-Reply-To: <87lfp6vnvr.fsf@jlicht.xyz>
References: <20200213090615.29979-1-brice@waegenei.re>
 <87lfp6vnvr.fsf@jlicht.xyz>
Message-ID: <28e680a858a6ccf14c870882c9ecb07b@waegenei.re>
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>
Cc: 39587@debbugs.gnu.org, Guix-patches <guix-patches-bounces+brice+lists=waegenei.re@gnu.org>

On 2020-02-13 09:26, Jelle Licht wrote:
>   Is there any particular reason to pass '/bin' instead of the 
> (default)
>   '/sbin' here?
I wrongly though it wasn't used in Guix. It'll be removed.

>   It seems there are some tests included with haproxy using something
>   called 'VTest', in `scripts/run-regtests.sh' for example.
Those are regression tests, are they really useful for us?

>> +    (license (list license:gpl2+
>> +                   license:lgpl2.1))))
>                               ^ haproxy header files are licensed under
>                               lgpl2.1+, at least according to
> `doc/coding-style.txt'
The include files I opened, where « [...] version 2.1 exclusively. ». 
I'll append lgpl2.1+ for the header files without a license header.