[bug#53494] [PATCH] gnu: utf-8-lineseparator: Update to cj7.

[Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Am Montag, dem 24.01.2022 um 12:45 -0500 schrieb jgart:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:26:45 +0100 Liliana Marie Prikler
> <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Am Montag, dem 24.01.2022 um 00:48 -0500 schrieb jgart:
> > > * gnu/packages/textutils.scm (utf-8-lineseparator): Update to
> > > cj7.
> > > ---
> > >  gnu/packages/textutils.scm | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/textutils.scm
> > > b/gnu/packages/textutils.scm
> > > index 12e3d3b3c8..751b036f79 100644
> > > --- a/gnu/packages/textutils.scm
> > > +++ b/gnu/packages/textutils.scm
> > > @@ -1377,7 +1377,7 @@ (define-public go-github-com-errata-ai-vale
> > >  (define-public utf-8-lineseparator
> > >    (package
> > >      (name "utf-8-lineseparator")
> > > -    (version "cj3")
> > > +    (version "cj7")
> > >      (source (origin
> > >                (method git-fetch)
> > >                (uri (git-reference
> > > @@ -1386,7 +1386,7 @@ (define-public utf-8-lineseparator
> > >                (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> > >                (sha256
> > >                 (base32
> > > -               
> > > "1xnbcanqn5jr965gw9195ij6hz04clfm77m5776dysn9nykn20w1"))))
> > > +               
> > > "0lqwfrwq28246lja2gawf5jllh4smddswkpd5lscvc2ynylcmmzx"))))
> > >      (build-system gnu-build-system)
> > >      (arguments
> > >       `(#:make-flags
> > I know this ought to have been caught by whoever reviewed the
> > package
> > back then, but is "cj" really a relevant part of the version?
> 
> Hi lilyp, 
> 
> That's the author's system for version releases.
> 
> They're not using semver. See the hugs module/system for one example
> of a versioning system that is not semver in upstream GNU/Guix.
That doesn't answer my question and instead just raises more.  We
typically strip meaningless version prefixes such as "v", (weird)
spellings of the package name, etc.  Why is cj special in this regard?

Also for hugs, we could be using CalVer as far as I can see, though
it's unlikely to receive a version bump after 15 years.

Cheers