[bug#67451] [PATCH] licenses: Add CC-PDDC license.

[bug#67451] [PATCH] licenses: Add CC-PDDC license.

[Aaron Covrig via Guix-patches via]

* gnu/license.scm (CC-PDDC): New variable.

Change-Id: I272f08fde34aaba7acf4cca3327e56fe065dcf10
---
Adding a less common Creative Commons license from the Linux Foundation
SPDX license list for the inclusion of additional software.
 guix/licenses.scm | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm
index d200614d91..291bccdf56 100644
--- a/guix/licenses.scm
+++ b/guix/licenses.scm
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ (define-module (guix licenses)
             bsd-0 bsd-1 bsd-2 bsd-3 bsd-4
             non-copyleft
             cc0
+	    cc-pddc
             cc-by2.0 cc-by3.0 cc-by4.0
             cc-by-sa2.0 cc-by-sa3.0 cc-by-sa4.0
             cddl1.0 cddl1.1
@@ -262,6 +263,11 @@ (define cc0
            "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:CC0"
            "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC0"))
 
+(define cc-pddc
+  (license "CC-PDDC"
+           "https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-PDDC"
+           "Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication and Certification"))
+
 (define cc-by-sa4.0
   (license "CC-BY-SA 4.0"
            "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"

base-commit: d987b75618a62c95c030e7ca53e0972e700c4f06
prerequisite-patch-id: b20d54ba34bb720fc0d3f0d0cf88b4f453c62e32
-- 
2.41.0

[bug#67451] [PATCH v1] licenses: Add CC-PDDC license.

[Aaron Covrig via Guix-patches via]

* gnu/license.scm (CC-PDDC): New variable.
* guix/import/utils.scm : Add CC-PDDC.

Change-Id: I272f08fde34aaba7acf4cca3327e56fe065dcf10
---
Missed adding the identifier into import/utils.scm

 guix/import/utils.scm | 1 +
 guix/licenses.scm     | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/guix/import/utils.scm b/guix/import/utils.scm
index 0cf52cdbde..4b44ff0a0b 100644
--- a/guix/import/utils.scm
+++ b/guix/import/utils.scm
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ (define %spdx-license-identifiers
     ("BSD-3-Clause"               . license:bsd-3)
     ("BSD-4-Clause"               . license:bsd-4)
     ("CC0-1.0"                    . license:cc0)
+    ("CC-PDDC"                    . license:cc-pddc)
     ("CC-BY-2.0"                  . license:cc-by2.0)
     ("CC-BY-3.0"                  . license:cc-by3.0)
     ("CC-BY-4.0"                  . license:cc-by4.0)
diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm
index d200614d91..291bccdf56 100644
--- a/guix/licenses.scm
+++ b/guix/licenses.scm
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ (define-module (guix licenses)
             bsd-0 bsd-1 bsd-2 bsd-3 bsd-4
             non-copyleft
             cc0
+	    cc-pddc
             cc-by2.0 cc-by3.0 cc-by4.0
             cc-by-sa2.0 cc-by-sa3.0 cc-by-sa4.0
             cddl1.0 cddl1.1
@@ -262,6 +263,11 @@ (define cc0
            "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:CC0"
            "http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC0"))
 
+(define cc-pddc
+  (license "CC-PDDC"
+           "https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-PDDC"
+           "Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication and Certification"))
+
 (define cc-by-sa4.0
   (license "CC-BY-SA 4.0"
            "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"

base-commit: d987b75618a62c95c030e7ca53e0972e700c4f06
prerequisite-patch-id: b20d54ba34bb720fc0d3f0d0cf88b4f453c62e32
-- 
2.41.0

[bug#67451] [PATCH] licenses: Add CC-PDDC license.

[Simon Tournier]

Hi,

Thanks for the patch.

On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 22:11, Aaron Covrig via Guix-patches via <guix-patches@gnu.org> wrote:

> * gnu/license.scm (CC-PDDC): New variable.

Well, a naive question: what package(s) could potentially use this
license?

Moreover, this license is not listed in:

    https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html

and the link <https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-PDDC> points to:

  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ [no longer live] 


Cheers,
simon

[bug#67451] [PATCH] licenses: Add CC-PDDC license.

[Aaron Covrig via Guix-patches via]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1333 bytes --]

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:01:47 +0100
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> 
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 22:11, Aaron Covrig via Guix-patches via
> <guix-patches@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> > * gnu/license.scm (CC-PDDC): New variable.  
> 
> Well, a naive question: what package(s) could potentially use this
> license?
> 
> Moreover, this license is not listed in:
> 
>     https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
> 
> and the link <https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-PDDC> points to:
> 
>   https://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ [no longer live] 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> simon
> 

Good question, I'm slowly trying to run through some rust packages
(mostly in crates-io.scm) with the intent of upgrading nu-shell
(currently quite out of date to the extent that most online
documenation is now dubious with new features added and a lot of
commands removed or changed). While adding and upgrading packages, I
ran across the rust package `pwd` (https://crates.io/crates/pwd/1.4.0)
which uses this license.

There is a slim chance the author might be willing to update the
package to a dual license, but it seemed like adding this would still
be useful for completeness sake (and in the case that they aren't able
to be reached easily).

V/R,

Aaron

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

bug#67451: [PATCH] licenses: Add CC-PDDC license.

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1031 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 01:12:33PM -0500, Aaron Covrig via Guix-patches via wrote:
> Good question, I'm slowly trying to run through some rust packages
> (mostly in crates-io.scm) with the intent of upgrading nu-shell
> (currently quite out of date to the extent that most online
> documenation is now dubious with new features added and a lot of
> commands removed or changed). While adding and upgrading packages, I
> ran across the rust package `pwd` (https://crates.io/crates/pwd/1.4.0)
> which uses this license.
> 
> There is a slim chance the author might be willing to update the
> package to a dual license, but it seemed like adding this would still
> be useful for completeness sake (and in the case that they aren't able
> to be reached easily).

Thanks for working on the Rust packages and looking ahead towards
needing this license.

I'm going to put this patch on the backburner for now, until we actually
have some patches that need this license. When the time comes, we can
reopen this ticket.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]