From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2P/RHq04vmEpwgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:38:21 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id oPx1Gq04vmGcBgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 19:38:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E87B991 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:38:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40000 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myfX9-0008EW-P9 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 14:38:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myfWs-0008EN-Hw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 14:38:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myfWs-0002XQ-6m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 14:38:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myfWr-0000UH-Nn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 14:38:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#52596] [guix-artwork PATCH] website: Relabel stable/latest to release/current. Resent-From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 19:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52596 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zimoun Cc: Julien Lepiller , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 52596@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 52596-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52596.16398562281807 (code B ref 52596); Sat, 18 Dec 2021 19:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 52596) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2021 19:37:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myfVz-0000T4-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 14:37:08 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:36168 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myfVx-0000Su-7E for 52596@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 14:37:06 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C1953606F5; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:37:02 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1639856223; bh=GEUWqYPH3f976X5qeRqqBW9UdO/7/M6+FNSkh3SG5ls=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=l/eR7B2FpU3crJ71iNIE/O4aL12/5gtLM2COWuPtRHbNxPPRvtaaZR8MvDSzvjvAR NKtMMpJ3wXvKfoDjlI+vdNScLvMfcDpxRUmiaXM0j2A/cAu49i3X1kMql4tdkU8Cxi lwPIguh8esBSZrjt+8znA/Q6IxmR6hO+0Qhdk0Ik= Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:36:53 +0100 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Message-ID: <20211218193653.5h5aex5m6wbxq6dc@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20211218104038.306475-1-zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> <20211218152217.l5vtbwkwhmiwuzfe@pelzflorian.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1639856301; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=RIoWZ9l0LZmiWLjCR+KouppHchyK1aHqYMBRgREW7lA=; b=jPkCbcwYUHTGV5U42tTFSlx/6qeNf13mdVm2JDiiYhtzJlgudUzB9Jf9p06YgUiDwUmeU0 R8Tm/+X+a2lcVLYRLgN99yKnCyGGwhe+FNx6ofCCch2QlYEc8bQ07iDilYcNrxQPbHggq6 mBFmUncx1V2BzIuyfGU67dAEq0Fz3QU9okkkYEy0wo94p+t9oGLQFgLhxuKUFnyqqQneYm SAjIX/oftaVigAf0Uf659Zpl6rGBVc7DVHpcwnRCwIOf84OvFNLrTpiMtfGY4bGmVvunqw sPS6TKQqbRduxS46ybtxu7b9l29lxSXFu8q0fMX6UoJdbDqfOcrlG/7wbBsVJA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1639856301; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ZDr/McUgZ4iBifoXzQjzGUEz3KZ/rBhGvpmh5tqAvDrIDubqvkKIIo9Bwc4r82l1sgcEHG bZN+4+au4QvmIUPvhnBGBT0VG8v726Vuh2qWJ5rTmnEHAuUfK3hUk0wosH6yEUi6syoqj/ wWwvOtLsiybDIr7GMISTr3mYBGsmewxHFXY2D8pQSMCJw7AbGqiFu6o7W0kmj+ckO5+QS6 GxzXLSl4hGED/jUiVT77DDT7X5R8jAtizWJUS9uhlbGyd42XLRl1ejJlsw/get87jBbyVs f5beJdTJGsHg4rIrHj+iSYNTIB6A928PwK7ylWKm1J2kSmZYe6qTMLyiaFCU7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b="l/eR7B2F"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.81 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b="l/eR7B2F"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 43E87B991 X-Spam-Score: -0.81 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: qJ7m8FKA/Pmr Hi simon. What matters is that users try first to install with the stable Guix System image, because it is more likely to succeed, but if it does not succeed, they can try the other one. In this regard, the terms stable/latest seem fine to me. 1.3.0/current might reverse the order. On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 04:43:57PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > However, I have a strong opinion that this label stable/latest is > confusing, at least in the nav bar. Especially if you come from other > distros. For instance, stable never receives fixes, so it is not > 'stable' but 'frozen'. The discussion on IRC provess you right that users get confused. > Initially, I wanted to replace 'stable' by the current version number; > something using (latest-guix-version). I think it is the best: clear > and easy to translate. However, I had some hard time with all these > quote, backquote, unquote, so I gave up. :-) I agree that the "stable" manual is better described as 1.3.0 (like what your patch does) and not as stable. But I am unsure if the stable manual is needed at all. You have a more experienced judgment here though. Regards, Florian