From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id aHwBGgz4LWF7mwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 11:36:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id WFqwFQz4LWEIPgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:36:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 317EB1B871 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 11:36:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL0Bf-0002Jb-7G for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 05:36:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL0BW-0002I4-03 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 05:36:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL0BV-0005UP-Ou for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 05:36:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mL0BV-00027I-Mm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 05:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#50283] HwInfo Resent-From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50283 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Raghav Gururajan Cc: 50283@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50283-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50283.16304025488115 (code B ref 50283); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:36:01 +0000 Received: (at 50283) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2021 09:35:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mL0BI-00026p-FK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 05:35:48 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:41962 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mL0BF-00026g-N9 for 50283@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 05:35:47 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50A8E360674; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 11:35:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1630402544; bh=5LxhDhkEAug6Q8uY+8+IxS3hRX9wC2SGOYOs/5yZ5pM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=4RurQtepzOXOwDVNULXatNlnHoIXSWwgu8ppXHSjqcdh4tJe+z1HGa1KQ0Z82MEi7 mhhX8p5Rk9cNuJ4zu78daPvpiVdeLeAnWdtBt4LG4htsrt++rvCljgo+SqTjhh7+h0 oPN6f0C8IZ7UI5MuBuXxATWvlpu2dfhTaFOLVQKo= Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 11:35:36 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Message-ID: <20210831093536.nefel7is5l5crsk4@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <2c8e9e9d-c492-ea37-3414-c38e8bc4b2a1@raghavgururajan.name> <20210830193525.2288-1-rg@raghavgururajan.name> <20210830231323.e2ybja6ui5xmal6t@pelzflorian.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.00 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; none X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 317EB1B871 X-Spam-Score: -4.00 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: OkQufNgj/WFX Thank you for merging the others’ patches. Could you change the grammar of the description as I wrote at ? On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:27:33PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > > but isn’t this license:x11-style? > The wordings coincide with ISC and expat. Should I mention non-copyleft > instead? The wording is the same as except for the licensor’s name, so I thought it best be specified as x11-style. Regards, Florian