From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id Qxc+KWILH2C3YQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 21:34:26 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id aDGNJGILH2AnQgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 21:34:26 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF7F940105 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 21:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35006 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8VDk-000169-Qp for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:34:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8VDQ-00014T-5q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:34:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8VDO-0002GB-B7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:34:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8VDO-0008J4-7Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#46352] [PATCH 0/4] Update Raku (Perl 6) Resent-From: Alexandru-Sergiu Marton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 21:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 46352 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 46352@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Alexandru-Sergiu Marton X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161264723531914 (code B ref -1); Sat, 06 Feb 2021 21:34:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2021 21:33:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46561 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8VDG-0008If-K3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:33:54 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57370) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8VDE-0008IW-91 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:33:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8VDE-00013n-1l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:33:52 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:60677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8VDB-00028d-RT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 16:33:51 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9916216005C for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 22:33:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.ro; s=2017; t=1612647224; bh=4XVl+63DzEydBJtu9O9FvLQN90S4+OK796xSu6vd/LU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=Js1dD256fMX1zl+J12lW+qiZBFcC93DJmLgmSt0WNEZWcgj9khbLAdUlSdwaoak/l nQBKwqYbUHASznz5Ho3sgAaxajOFPr0e5OTNjMkae9FofPjTsUrwBjFmulIpfDv+nq vxm8OiAGG1NEDwbznbn3DtIMkgqR/ovGMAKksLxCeLTMn2UnmXuWU34jhRVDaUnqgt DIMY1C0d1zhuy4Y7ua/u6JR9qBue2ePDEKktE6/pS5iTFf+tbra0uK1erX7BbN523G p7Tf6zBYDURnlUURefRKcqXHTpLfCFFO+fVKwzNdu8MVubcr6bZ/ntnl9WLx8RT8KF kJID8C8dZ/ZFw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4DY5Bb5QMqz6tmR; Sat, 6 Feb 2021 22:33:43 +0100 (CET) From: Alexandru-Sergiu Marton Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 23:33:32 +0200 Message-Id: <20210206213332.11417-1-brown121407@posteo.ro> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=brown121407@posteo.ro; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 3.74 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.ro header.s=2017 header.b=Js1dD256; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.ro (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: DCF7F940105 X-Spam-Score: 3.74 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 6vSStXbFkvjf Hi, These patches update Rakudo, the Raku language compiler (formerly known as Perl 6), to a newer version. I don't consider the work complete, because of a few reasons: * I didn't check if the perl6-* are compatible with this change; * I didn't change the description/synopsis of what I updated; yet the packages build and seem to work just fine. I wanted to start a discussion before I go all-in on this. Since the official name of the language is now Raku [1], should we rename the module file to raku.scm? Also, in synopsis/description like the one for Rakudo, where it says "Perl 6 Compiler", should we make it "Raku compiler" instead? The website for Rakudo says it is "The most mature, production-ready implementation of the Raku language." [2]. [1]: https://github.com/Raku/problem-solving/pull/89#issuecomment-541628893 [2]: https://rakudo.org/ Note that the rakudo package seems to be non-deterministic. The last version was, and this new one is too. Also note that I don't have any experience with Perl/Raku or Perl/Raku tooling, so if I messed something up that should have been an obvious Perl/Raku-related idiosyncrasy, please tell me. Alexandru-Sergiu Marton (4): gnu: Add dyncall. gnu: moarvm: Update to 2020.12. gnu: nqp: Update to 2020.12. gnu: rakudo: Update to 2020.12. gnu/packages/c.scm | 39 +++++++++++ gnu/packages/perl6.scm | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) -- 2.30.0