From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qGi5HMzW+V/kQgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:16:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id oHVZGMzW+V/edQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:16:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9719403A4 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 16:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37094 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyGuQ-0002D9-Al for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:16:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyGuI-0002Cu-PB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:16:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyGuI-0001Nd-Db for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:16:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyGuI-0001Iy-8W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45742] [PATCH] gnu: Add x86emu. Resent-From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45742 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: me@tobias.gr, 45742@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: Vincent Legoll , 45742@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16102089394987 (code B ref -1); Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:16:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2021 16:15:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52493 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyGtv-0001IM-08 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:15:39 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59464) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kyGtt-0001ID-Sf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:15:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyGtt-000261-Nk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:15:37 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:35154 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyGtr-00018W-Q5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 11:15:37 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE3343605C2; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 17:15:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1610208932; bh=lHNh3+FgRDW51khYsL6nqNiiuxGHoBZamy7xmG6qXZY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=FV63YXguDl+Yr5yJ+NW+3oVLV0cOEwLOAg/HQytS1LHebYTB0NPM+ixrMr/9Fk9eE sN1jICtg9AFOsofh33p/iItx+uXtUAy9hl1l7nlJSh+PvSJo+RUaD/M9haPg7Y1Kmv 0oYRjzhgtQdysksyLPwyV+jdEEKFjhQTL+BRJNZ8= Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 17:15:21 +0100 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Message-ID: <20210109161521.jtzlwmh5rsuhxeew@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20210109143038.1918-1-vincent.legoll@gmail.com> <874kjq6rgb.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <874kjq6rgb.fsf@nckx> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.45.111.108; envelope-from=pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de; helo=mail.pelzflorian.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: vincent.legoll@gmail.com Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.35 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b=FV63YXgu; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9E9719403A4 X-Spam-Score: -1.35 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: LDg5ZXzXUOsE On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 04:49:24PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via wrote: > > +(define-public x86emu > > There's at least one other x86emu (declared obsolete upstream[0]) and I > wouldn't be surprised if there were twenty. But if (this) upstream insists > on such a generic name, so be it. Another x86emu is part of xorg-server’s non-installed sources and used by the v86d Guix package which is used by the uvesafb driver in the Linux kernel. Anyway, I suppose the name x86emu is fine for this package. Regards, Florian