From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id HyURBaC3vV87OQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:47:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id zoxfAKC3vV8ZIQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:47:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7489404D3 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45740 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khjtm-0005lO-MH for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:47:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khjte-0005lC-Kh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:47:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1khjte-0005pd-Dy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:47:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khjte-0001M0-By for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43976] [PATCH] Chicken build system + some example eggs Resent-From: raingloom Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43976 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 43976@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43976-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43976.16062688205193 (code B ref 43976); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:47:02 +0000 Received: (at 43976) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2020 01:47:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khjtc-0001Lc-6U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:47:00 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:37654) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1khjtW-0001LF-0A for 43976@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:46:58 -0500 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CgkJq1DlRzFcs1; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:46:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1606268811; bh=0/HfAoAC5HT5G3IMdJrF7nMdQPq3lkyYznC7pO+nK70=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JotlNR1s1s9DMCcia/P5jtc5YMsE8thcO6emAbsXPnpc4koRPQOvlUo+1EKbWcTOg 2Yit3/FvcbNpST9f1reQLwlnhthhKNg3LZjj+CAZbOy/sb+jtd69IYH9828Eeekx1J UCGkZfArnyYlD+ncPtamFjuUNrnm/WQqAiDZbTv4= X-Riseup-User-ID: 8DB4885BD8B828DD2384919DB73D4D6B2638000FB2F27A0DE55966E27A784455 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CgkJp2v0FzJrSB; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:46:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 21:22:54 +0100 From: raingloom Message-ID: <20201124212254.0c69b459@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <20201123001241.024b7a08@riseup.net> References: <20201013105220.7606ee5a@riseup.net> <87mu0j347o.fsf@gnu.org> <20201120055117.7cb76230@riseup.net> <20201121214543.37c27429@riseup.net> <20201123001241.024b7a08@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_/IuhzkrU9eHSihXZ4qdF7sGu" X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=JotlNR1s; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: uhZKdA/oIABH --MP_/IuhzkrU9eHSihXZ4qdF7sGu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:12:41 +0100 raingloom wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 21:45:43 +0100 > raingloom wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:51:17 +0100 > > raingloom wrote: > > > > > Possibly more important: I noticed some warnings in some builds > > > about cp(1). So far it hasn't caused any issues. Gonna fix this, > > > then I think it'll be mergeable. > > > > Seems to be a srfi-18 specific issue, so I'm calling > > chicken-build-system final for now. You can merge it if it stands up > > to a review. > > The other eggs also seem fine, srfi-18 just has a somewhat shoddily > > written auxiliary build script to generate some type information, > > probably based on the current Chicken version? I'm not sure what > > it's doing to be honest. It doesn't fail to build because the script > > doesn't check for errors, which is why it took a while to notice it. > > > > This is why we always `set -e` in our Bash scripts, kids. > > > > Anyways, all other eggs seem to be fine, and none of them depend on > > srfi-18. > > Forgot to actually send the modified patch :D > The others should be unchanged. *facepalm* i somehow messed up the parens in that one. maybe i didn't have Paredit on or something??? here's the fixed version. but yeah, with this, it should be complete. --MP_/IuhzkrU9eHSihXZ4qdF7sGu Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-Added-search-paths-for-Chicken-Scheme.patch >From 2ba52705cf909590a428ea598dfdf1c61ada6a8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: raingloom Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:11:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 01/20] gnu: Added search paths for Chicken Scheme. * gnu/packages/chicken.scm (chicken): Added search paths [native-search-paths]: added CHICKEN_REPOSITORY_PATH and a comment about CHICKEN_INCLUDE_PATH. --- gnu/packages/chicken.scm | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/chicken.scm b/gnu/packages/chicken.scm index 729cf25a6c..42232ec3b8 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/chicken.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/chicken.scm @@ -59,6 +59,17 @@ ;; Parallel builds are not supported, as noted in README. #:parallel-build? #f)) + (native-search-paths + (list (search-path-specification + (variable "CHICKEN_REPOSITORY_PATH") + ;; TODO extract binary version into a module level definition. + (files (list "var/lib/chicken/11"))))) + ;; the use of this variable is unclear. the online docs don't even + ;; mention it. i'm leaving it in as a comment for now, in case + ;; something breaks. + ;; (search-path-specification + ;; (variable "CHICKEN_INCLUDE_PATH") + ;; (files '("share"))) (propagated-inputs `(("gcc-toolchain" ,gcc-toolchain))) (home-page "https://www.call-cc.org/") (synopsis "R5RS Scheme implementation that compiles native code via C") -- 2.29.2 --MP_/IuhzkrU9eHSihXZ4qdF7sGu--