From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id IfJRBKyRuV9ydQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:16:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id rZcPO6uRuV9YOwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:16:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533089400BF for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52222 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgbAw-00068A-9d for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:16:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgbAo-00067w-S8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:16:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgbAo-0007xA-Ji for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:16:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kgbAo-0000s7-Fb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43976] [PATCH] Chicken build system + some example eggs Resent-From: raingloom Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43976 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Efraim Flashner Cc: 43976@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 43976-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43976.16059969023249 (code B ref 43976); Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 43976) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2020 22:15:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46350 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kgb9p-0000qE-O0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:15:02 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:39204) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kgb9o-0000px-Ft for 43976@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:15:00 -0500 Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Cdnlh695KzFfFH; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:14:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1605996900; bh=r5LZn86yGFJn9AzZHYqdJ+gvTHRPddu8CvXCzvj/gkY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pYXF+ati8Pa1z1HwtqmO0oYpuCVsu6liOXez3STCzYaZTwC3kulSAkxNOz54cd4iI iNNItFIHcQvj1pXIVFDN4+SnIctTXTIC732P3bQU9YrS2qQXX0Fl7Pc7IOXeCETy9v NVENFxSQJwfTxfRPKk1Vx2FcmsJKM95PXtZ+kiEY= X-Riseup-User-ID: 3D2BD12349E0909C75E65DE1122D63CA66C1A3CB5EB8B939E982CF01EE1A84BB Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Cdnlg4fR2zJpKH; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:14:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 23:13:38 +0100 From: raingloom Message-ID: <20201121231338.6fcf3659@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <20201121205858.GE1088@E5400> References: <20201013105220.7606ee5a@riseup.net> <87mu0j347o.fsf@gnu.org> <20201120055117.7cb76230@riseup.net> <20201121214543.37c27429@riseup.net> <20201121205858.GE1088@E5400> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=pYXF+ati; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: qefe9/AddFhe On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:58:58 +0200 Efraim Flashner wrote: > > The other eggs also seem fine, srfi-18 just has a somewhat shoddily > > written auxiliary build script to generate some type information, > > probably based on the current Chicken version? I'm not sure what > > it's doing to be honest. It doesn't fail to build because the > > script doesn't check for errors, which is why it took a while to > > notice it. > > > > This is why we always `set -e` in our Bash scripts, kids. > > > > Anyways, all other eggs seem to be fine, and none of them depend on > > srfi-18. > > You can always rant at upstream or your monitor, your choice :) > Oh I will, once I figure out where to do that. So far I've been more focused on just getting enough things working to hack on the 9p egg.